Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Henry v. Louisiana 392 U.S. 655

← Cases

Henry v. Louisiana

392 U.S. 655 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-06-17 Docket No. 932 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 655
HENRY v. LOUISIANA.
No. 932.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Thomas Barr III for appellant.
Jack P. F. Oremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .

Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 , 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 , 455.

Cases cited