Hyperlawhypertext legal database Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. King 393 U.S. 321

← Cases

Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. King

393 U.S. 321 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1969-01-13 Docket No. 756 English

Judges Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 321
MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, et al.
No. 756.
Decided January 13, 1969.
H. Vincent E. Mitchell and J.. Martin Regan for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.