Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Lichten v. Texas 393 U.S. 86

← Cases

Lichten v. Texas

393 U.S. 86 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1968-10-28 Docket No. 414 English

Judges Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 86
LICHTEN et al. v. TEXAS.
No. 414.
Decided October 28, 1968.
Chris Dixie for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Ca-rubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Hawthorne Phillips, Gilbert J. Pena, and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.