Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sumrall v. Kidd 394 U.S. 215

← Cases

Sumrall v. Kidd

394 U.S. 215 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1969-03-10 Docket No. 1167 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 215
SUMRALL v. KIDD et al.
No. 1167,
Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.
Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.
Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97 .

Cases cited