Hyperlawhypertext legal database Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto 395 U.S. 163

← Cases

Buckley v. Ohio by Barbuto

395 U.S. 163 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1969-05-19 Docket No. 1209 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 163
BUCKLEY et al., dba BUCKLEY’S AUTO WRECKING v. OHIO BY BARBUTO.
No. 1209.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Edward D. Wyner for appellants.
Paul W. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, pro se, and Robert D. Macklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of Ohio, and James V. Barbuto, pro se, appellees.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.