Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n 396 U.S. 1014

← Cases

Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n

396 U.S. 1014 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1970-01-12 Docket No. 669 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1014
No. 669.
Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Assn.
Eugene Gressman for petitioner. Thomas V. Koykka and Edward R. Brown for respondent.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motion to use record and appendix in No. 73, October Term, 1967 [In re Ruffalo, 390 U. S. 544 ], granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

Cases cited