Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Carlos v. New York 396 U.S. 119

← Cases

Carlos v. New York

396 U.S. 119 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1969-12-08 Docket No. 524 English

Judges The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice Harlan’s separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966).

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 119
CARLOS v. NEW YORK
No. 524.
Decided December 8, 1969
Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice Harlan’s separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476 , 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 , 455 (1966).

Cases cited