Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Byrne v. Karalexis 397 U.S. 985

← Cases

Byrne v. Karalexis

397 U.S. 985 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1970-03-23 Docket No. 1149 English

Judges Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 905 [probable jurisdiction noted, supra] .

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 985
No. 1149.
Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County, et al. v. Karalexis et al.
Garrett H. Byrne and Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, pro sese, and John Wall and Lawrence P. Cohen, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. Edward de Grazia, Nathan Lewin, and Alan M. Dershowitz for appellees.

Appeal from D. C. Mass. Motion to vacate order of this Court of December 15, 1969 [ 396 U. S. 976 ], denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 905 [probable jurisdiction noted, supra] .

Cases cited