Evans, qui tam, &c., v. Bollen.Syllabus
Jurisdiction. — Penal action.The circuit court i annot take original cognisance of a suit for a penalty incurred by an offence against the laws of the United States: if the offence was committed within a state, it must be tried in such state. -
This was qui tam action, in which the following declaration was filed:
In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Pennsylvania District, of the Middle Circuit.
District of Pennsylvania, ss.
George Bollen, late of the district of Pennsylvania, yeoman, was summoned to answer to the United States and to John Evans, who sues in this behalf, as well for the said United States as for himself, of a plea that he rendered to the said United States, and to the said John, who sues as aforesaid, the sum- of $2000, which to them he owes, and from them unjustly detains : and whereupon, the said John, who sues in this behalf, as well for the said United States, as for himself, by Joseph Thomas, his attorney, saith, that the said George, on the first day of April, in the year of our Lord 1797, at the port of New York, to wit, at the district aforesaid, was aiding and abetting, in preparing and sending away from a port within the said United-States, to v/.t, fi'om the port of New York, a certain vessel called the Betsey, intending that the same should be employed for the purpose of procuring from a foreign country, to wit, from the coast of Africa, the inhabitants of such foreign country, to be transported to a foreign country, to wit, to the island of Saint Croix, to be disposed Of as slaves, against the form of the , statute in such case made and provided ; by means whereof, *and by -* force of the statute in such case made and provided, an action hath accrued to the said John, who sues in this behalf, as well for the said United Staten, as for himself, to have and demand of and from the said George, the said num of $2000 : yet the said George (although often requested) hath not paid ‘he said $2000, or any part thereof, to the said John, who in this behalf sues lor the United States as well as for himself, but the same to him to pay hath hitherto wholly refused, and still doth refuse, to the damage of the said John, who sues as aforesaid, $500. And thereof he brings suit, &c.
Joseph Thomas, attorney for plaintiff.
The action was founded on the act of congress, “ to prohibit the carrying m che slave trade, from the United States to any foreign place or country” (1 U. S. Stat. 347), of which the following were the material sections, in the discussion:
Sect. 1. “ That no citizen or citizens of the United States, or foreigner, Dr any other person coming into, or residing within the same, shall, for himself or any other person whatsoever, either as master, factor or owner, build, fit, equip, load or otherwise prepare any ship or vessel, within any port or