← Cases

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

405 U.S. 1062 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1972-04-17 Docket No. 71-732 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1062
No. 71-732.
Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent v. Bustamonte.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 953.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Stuart P. Tobisman, Esquire, of Los Angeles, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent pro hac vice in this case.