← Cases

David v. Texas

409 U.S. 898 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1972-10-10 Docket No. 70-5008; No. 70-5011; No. 70-5022; No. 70-5024; No. 70-5031; No. 70-5044; No. 70-5064; No. 70-5065; No. 70-5066; No. 70-5067; No. 70-5069; No. 70-5079; No. 71-249; No. 71-308; No. 71-473; No. 71-506; No. 71-1111; No. 71-1147; No. 71-1164; No. 71-1206; No. 71-1214; No. 71-1227 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 898
No. 70-5008.
No. 70-5011.
No. 70-5022.
No. 70-5024.
No. 70-5031.
No. 70-5044.
No. 70-5064.
No. 70-5065.
No. 70-5066.
No. 70-5067.
No. 70-5069.
No. 70-5079.
No. 71-249.
No. 71-308.
No. 71-473.
No. 71-506.
No. 71-1111.
No. 71-1147.
No. 71-1164.
No. 71-1206.
No. 71-1214.
No. 71-1227.
David, aka Davis v. Texas, Thames v. Texas, Tea v. Texas, Farrell v. Stovall et al., Sellars v. Beto, Corrections Director, Jackson v. Beto, Corrections Director, Jefferson et al. v. Hackney, Commissioner of Public Welfare, et al., Miller v. Georgia, Williams v. Smith, Warden, Morales v. Texas, McKenzie v. Texas, Henderson v. Georgia, Orr v. Trinter et al., United States v. Byrum, Executrix, Weg v. United States, United States et al. v. Midwest Video Corp., Muse v. North Carolina, Ford Motor Co. v. Ellipse Corp., Watts v. Mylius, DePugh v. United States, Stein v. United States, Mastrotataro v. United States,

408 U. S. 937 ;

407 U. S. 901 ;

406 U. S. 535 ;

408 U. S. 938 ;

408 U. S. 943 ;

408 U. S. 125 ;

406 U. S. 962 ;

406 U. S. 649 ;

406 U. S. 974 ;

406 U. S. 948 ;

406 U. S. 906 ;

407 U. S. 920 ;

408 U. S. 922 ; and

406 U. S. 967 . Petitions for rehearing denied.

Cases cited