Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Rose v. Hodges 423 U.S. 1092

← Cases

Rose v. Hodges

423 U.S. 1092 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1976-01-26 Docket No. 75-139; No. 75-406; No. 75-415; No. 75-5154; No. 75-5348; No. 75-5587; No. 75-5666; No. 75-5671 English

Judges Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1092
No. 75-139.
No. 75-406.
No. 75-415.
No. 75-5154.
No. 75-5348.
No. 75-5587.
No. 75-5666.
No. 75-5671.
Rose, Warden v. Hodges et al., Wunnicke et al. v. United States, Portland Cement Assn. v. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, et al., Sam v. Mississippi, Lazur v. Broad Mountain Club, Inc., Heckstall v. District of Columbia, Harris v. New York, McLaughlin v. Vinzant, Correctional Superintendent,

ante, p. 19;

ante, p. 1033;

ante, p. 1025;

ante, p. 1018;

anté, p. 1020;

ante, p. 1023;

ante, p. 1036; and

ante, p. 1037. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.