Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie 434 U.S. 1327

← Cases

National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie

434 U.S. 1327 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1977-08-26 Docket No. A-162 English

Delivered by Stevens J.

Contents

Majority — Stevens J.

p. 1327
NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA et al. v. VILLAGE OF SKOKIE
No. A-162.
Decided August 26, 1977

Following the entry of this Court’s order of June 14, 1977, 432 U. S. 43 , the Illinois Appellate Court reviewed and substantially modified the injunction entered against applicants by the Circuit Court of Cook County, upholding only that portion of the injunction that prevented applicants from displaying the swastika “in the course of a demonstration, march or parade.” Thereafter, the Illinois Supreme Court scheduled an expedited review of the Appellate Court’s decision, but it denied an application for a stay of the injunction pending that review. On August 18, 1977, a similar application was submitted to me as Circuit Justice. I requested a response from the village of Skokie and have now decided to deny the application.

Applicants have not demonstrated that a stay is necessary to protect this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. There appears to be no danger that the controversy will become moot while the appeal is pending in the Illinois Supreme Court. Nor have applicants demonstrated that the Illinois courts have failed to comply with the “immediate appellate review” requirement of

p. 1328
this Court’s order of June 14, 1977. After the entry of that order, both the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court expedited their consideration of the case, and I am confident that the Illinois Supreme Court will make its decision without any unnecessary delay. Even “immediate” appellate review of an important and difficult issue necessitates appropriate deliberation. Considering these facts, the fact that the injunction has been substantially modified, and the fact that the entry of the stay would be tantamount to a decision on the merits in favor of the applicants, it seems clear that a stay should not be granted.

The application submitted to me as Circuit Justice is denied.

Cases cited