← Cases

Alford v. Central Intelligence Agency

449 U.S. 1027 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1980-12-01 Docket No. 79-6664; No. 79-6681; No. 79-6690; No. 79-6711; No. 79-6757; No. 79-6772; No. 79-6818; No. 79-6826; No. 79-6831; No. 79-6861; No. 80-1; No. 80-32; No. 80-44; No. 80-163; No. 80-211; No. 80-5050; No. 80-5051; No. 80-5053; No. 80-5173 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1027
No. 79-6664.
No. 79-6681.
No. 79-6690.
No. 79-6711.
No. 79-6757.
No. 79-6772.
No. 79-6818.
No. 79-6826.
No. 79-6831.
No. 79-6861.
No. 80-1.
No. 80-32.
No. 80-44.
No. 80-163.
No. 80-211.
No. 80-5050.
No. 80-5051.
No. 80-5053.
No. 80-5173.
Alford v. Central Intelligence Agency, Morton v. Stynchcombe, Sheriff, et al., Rosado et al. v. Civiletti, Attorney General, et al., Thiess v. Franklin Square Hospital, Inc., et al., Rucker v. Fickas et al., Clugston et al. v. Michigan et al., Smith v. Assignment Office of Montgomery County Circuit Court et al., Prejean v. Louisiana, Hunter v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida, Maratty v. Kentucky, Green v. Bartholomew et al., Hynning v. DuFief Mortgage, Inc., et al., Dual Manufacturing & Engineering, Inc., et al. v. Burris Industries, Inc., et al., In re Chestnutt Management Corp., Johnston v. United States et al., Johns v. Nanawale Community Assn. et al., Newbold v. United States Postal Service et al., Quinones v. Texas, Clay, Administrator v. Hall et al.,

ante, p. 854;

ante, p. 855;

ante, p. 856;

ante, p. 857;

ante, p. 860;

ante, p. 861;

ante, p. 864;

ante, p. 891;

ante, p. 865;

ante, p. 866;

ante, p. 868;

ante, p. 802;

ante, p. 870;

ante, p. 816;

ante, p. 876;

ante, p. 921;

ante, p. 878;

ante, p. 893; and

ante, p. 914. Petitions for rehearing denied.