Hyperlawhypertext legal database Public Service Commission v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. 476 U.S. 445

← Cases

Public Service Commission v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

476 U.S. 445 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1986-05-27 Docket No. 84-1362 English

Judges Justice Powell and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 445
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND
No. 84-1362.
Argued January 13, 1986
Decided May 27, 1986
Kirk J. Emge argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Jack D. Smith argued the cause for the Federal Communications Commission as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Fried, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Christopher J. Wright, Daniel M. Armstrong, and Jane E. Mago.
D. Michael Stroud argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were J. William Sarver, Mark J. Mathis, and Daniel I. Prywes.[1]

We vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and remand for further proceedings consist

p. 446
ent with the opinion in Louisiana Public Service Comm’n v. FCC, ante, p. 355.

It is so ordered.

Justice Powell and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.