← Cases

Martin v. Wilks

492 U.S. 932 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1989-08-11 Docket No. 87-1614; No. 87-1639; No. 87-1668; No. 87-7107; No. 88-420; No. 88-774; No. 88-897; No. 88-1612; No. 88-1616; No. 88-1672; No. 88-1711; No. 88-1717; No. 88-1799; No. 88-5241; No. 88-6494; No. 88-6723; No. 88-6917; No. 88-6959; No. 88-6992; No. 88-7057; No. 88-7065; No. 88-7103; No. 88-7107; No. 88-7128; No. 88-7148; No. 88-7157; No. 88-7171; No. 88-7200; No. 88-7240; No. 88-7272; No. 88-7281 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 932
No. 87-1614.
No. 87-1639.
No. 87-1668.
No. 87-7107.
No. 88-420.
No. 88-774.
No. 88-897.
No. 88-1612.
No. 88-1616.
No. 88-1672.
No. 88-1711.
No. 88-1717.
No. 88-1799.
No. 88-5241.
No. 88-6494.
No. 88-6723.
No. 88-6917.
No. 88-6959.
No. 88-6992.
No. 88-7057.
Martin et al. v. Wilks et al., Personnel Board of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al. v. Wilks et al., Arrington et al. v. Wilks et al., Slaughter v. Kentucky, Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly v. Thomas, Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain et al., Ashenbaugh et al. v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan, Hodge v. Kelly et al., Lombardo v. United States, Acosta v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Pruessman v. Lewis et al., Fassler v. United States, Jackson v. United States, Howard v. South Carolina, Wrenn v. Benson et al., Nixon v. Mississippi, Meade-Murphy v. City of Atlanta et al., Menard v. County of Henrico, Virginia, et al., Williams v. Wallman, Warden, et al., Ruscitti v. Estate of Ruscitti,

490 U. S. 755 ;

490 U. S. 1113 ;

491 U. S. 376 ;

490 U. S. 826 ;

490 U. S. 1105 ;

490 U. S. 1081 ;

491 U. S. 905 ;

490 U. S. 1082 ;

490 U. S. 1116 ;

490 U. S. 1099 ;

490 U. S. 1069 ;

490 U. S. 1102 ;

491 U. S. 907 ;

490 U. S. 1110 ;

490 U. S. 1093 ;

490 U. S. 1111 ;

p. 933
Barnes v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Martin v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al., O’Neal v. Eu et al., Carter v. Ohio, Martin v. Abram D. Mellinger Real Estate, Inc., In re Martin, May v. Hackett, Irving, aka Owens v. United States, Branham v. Grinage et al., Stengel v. United States, In re Humphrey,

No. 88-7065.

No. 88-7103.

No. 88-7107.

No. 88-7128.

No. 88-7148.

No. 88-7157.

No. 88-7171.

No. 88-7200.

No. 88-7240.

No. 88-7272.

No. 88-7281.

490 U. S. 1111 ;

491 U. S. 908 ;

ante, p. 909;

ante, p. 910;

ante, p. 904;

490 U. S. 1112 ;

490 U. S. 1113 ;

491 U. S. 909 ; and

491 U. S. 903 . Petitions for rehearing denied.

Cases cited