Hyperlawhypertext legal database Landes v. Joost 496 U.S. 934

← Cases

Landes v. Joost

496 U.S. 934 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1990-06-18 Docket No. 89-7063; No. 89-7300 English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Brennan J.

Contents
p. 934
No. 89-7063.
No. 89-7300.
Landes v. Joost. Britton v. Central Bank.

C. A. 3d Cir.; and

Ct. App. La., 2d Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until July 9, 1990, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cases cited

  • 464 U. S. 928 464 U. S. 928 p. 934