← Cases

Ohio v. Huertas

498 U.S. 1115 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1991-02-19 Docket No. 89-1944; No. 89-7787; No. 90-90; No. 90-484; No. 90-532; No. 90-5627; No. 90-5931; No. 90-5938; No. 90-5941; No. 90-5981; No. 90-5991; No. 90-6020; No. 90-6031; No. 90-6051; No. 90-6054; No. 90-6116; No. 90-6118; No. 90-6171; No. 90-6230; No. 90-6280; No. 90-6313 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1115
No. 89-1944.
No. 89-7787.
Ohio v. Huertas, Villegas v. California,

ante, p. 336;

ante, p. 966;

p. 1116
Hughes v. United States, Taber, dba Tabers Grass Farm v. Pledger, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Banks v. Sterling Merchandise, Inc., et al., Johnson et al. v. United States, Harris v. Cato et al., Gleason v. Stewart, Judge, Harris County, Texas District Court, et al., Mattson v. California, Endres v. Armontrout et al., Rodriguez-Diaz v. Florida et al., Cassidy v. Rose, Klein & Marias et al., Sowell v. Maloney, Deputy Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction, In re Sindram, Kinder v. Sandberg et al., Canterbury v. Kalisz, Desmond v. Department of Defense, Moore v. Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services et al., Martin v. Townsend et al., Young v. Johnson, Warden, Ganey v. Wilson et al.,

No. 90-90.

No. 90-484.

No. 90-532.

No. 90-5627.

No. 90-5931.

No. 90-5938.

No. 90-5941.

No. 90-5981.

No. 90-5991.

No. 90-6020.

No. 90-6031.

No. 90-6051.

No. 90-6054.

No. 90-6116.

No. 90-6118.

No. 90-6171.

No. 90-6230.

No. 90-6280.

No. 90-6313.

ante, p. 980;

ante, p. 967;

ante, p. 982;

ante, p. 1029;

ante, p. 1030;

ante, p. 1001;

ante, p. 1017;

ante, p. 1014;

ante, p. 1015;

ante, p. 1002;

ante, p. 177;

ante, p. 1033;

ante, p. 1070;

ante, p. 1034;

ante, p. 1036;

ante, p. 1051; and

ante, p. 1071. Petitions for rehearing denied.