← Cases

Rojas v. Alexander's Department Store, Inc.

502 U.S. 1000 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1991-12-02 Docket No. 90-1649; No. 90-1670; No. 90-1674; No. 90-1740; No. 90-1771; No. 90-1857; No. 90-1945; No. 90-7054; No. 90-7781; No. 90-8059; No. 90-8083; No. 90-8281; No. 90-8295; No. 90-8324; No. 90-8405; No. 90-8417; No. 90-8471; No. 90-8480; No. 91-41; No. 91-66; No. 91-116; No. 91-160; No. 91-174; No. 91-223; No. 91-5042; No. 91-5046; No. 91-5066; No. 91-5090; No. 91-5096; No. 91-5115; No. 91-5170; No. 91-5171; No. 91-5178; No. 91-5190; No. 91-5235; No. 91-5237; No. 91-5294; No. 91-5301; No. 91-5391; No. 91-5392; No. 91-5404; No. 91-5432; No. 91-5458; No. 91-5498; No. 91-5557; No. 91-5562; No. 91-5616 English

Judges Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1000
No. 90-1649.
No. 90-1670.
No. 90-1674.
No. 90-1740.
No. 90-1771.
No. 90-1857.
No. 90-1945.
No. 90-7054.
No. 90-7781.
No. 90-8059.
No. 90-8083.
No. 90-8281.
No. 90-8295.
No. 90-8324.
No. 90-8405.
No. 90-8417.
No. 90-8471.
No. 90-8480.
No. 91-41.
No. 91-66.
No. 91-116.
No. 91-160.
Rojas v. Alexander’s Department Store, Inc., Connors et al. v. United States, Denenburg et ux. v. United States, Safir v. Nickerson, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, City of Henderson et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada (Nevada Entertainment Industries, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest), City of Yonkers, New York v. United States et al. (two cases), King v. Board of Regents of the University of Georgia et al., Eaton v. Virginia, Twitty v. Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Sanders v. Kentucky, Anderson v. ALCOA et al., Brown v. Lungren, Attorney General of California, Kelly v. California, Morris et al. v. Donrey of Nevada, Inc., et al., Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al., In re Searcy, Cummings v. United States, Ebker v. Tan Jay International et al., Gargallo v. Gargallo, Stephens v. Alabama, Carroll et al. v. United States, First Federal Savings Bank & Trust et al. v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision, et al.,

ante, p. 809;

ante, p. 899;

ante, p. 811;

ante, p. 812;

ante, p. 816;

ante, p. 821;

ante, p. 824;

ante, p. 827;

ante, p. 831;

ante, p. 832;

ante, p. 841;

ante, p. 842;

ante, p. 844;

ante, p. 902;

ante, p. 806;

ante, p. 852;

ante, p. 853;

ante, p. 857;

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 862;

ante, p. 864;

p. 1001
Centennial et al. v. Placer Dome U. S., Inc., Dhaliwal v. Woods Division, Hesston Corp., et al., In re Peernock, McCulley v. United States, A’Giza v. San Bernardino West Side Community Development Corp. et al., Parks v. Saffle, Warden, Serna v. Arizona, Laws v. North Carolina, Edwards v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al., Crawford v. Michigan, Mason v. California, McKenzie v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, Ferdik v. Richardson et al., Pyle v. City of Tucson et al., Gilreath v. Zant, Warden, Alexander v. Missouri State Board of Law Examiners, Prince v. Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Purvin v. Bergens et al., Kleinschmidt v. Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Meyerson & Casey, P. A., et al., Forte v. Massachusetts, Jarvi v. Noble et al., Johnson v. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, In re Knowles, Jarvi v. United States et al., Sueing v. Brown et al.,

No. 91-174.

No. 91-223.

No. 91-5042.

No. 91-5046.

No. 91-5066.

No. 91-5090.

No. 91-5096.

No. 91-5115.

No. 91-5170.

No. 91-5171.

No. 91-5178.

No. 91-5190.

No. 91-5235.

No. 91-5237.

No. 91-5294.

No. 91-5301.

No. 91-5391.

No. 91-5392.

No. 91-5404.

No. 91-5432.

No. 91-5458.

No. 91-5498.

No. 91-5557.

No. 91-5562.

No. 91-5616.

ante, p. 864;

ante, p. 867;

ante, p. 806;

ante, p. 872;

ante, p. 873;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 875;

ante, p. 876;

ante, p. 911;

ante, p. 879;

ante, p. 880;

ante, p. 882;

ante, p. 885;

ante, p. 890;

ante, p. 891;

ante, p. 893;

ante, p. 913;

ante, p. 895;

ante, p. 914; and

ante, p. 926. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.