Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Neshewat v. Hagstrom 502 U.S. 1089

← Cases

Neshewat v. Hagstrom

502 U.S. 1089 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1992-02-24 Docket No. 91-6734; No. 91-6854 English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Stevens J.

Contents
p. 1089
No. 91-6734.
No. 91-6854.
Neshewat v. Hagstrom et al. Ingalls v. Roosevelt County, New Mexico, et al.

Ct. App. N. Y.; and

Sup. Ct. N. M. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 16, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cases cited