← Cases

Halas v. Department of Energy

502 U.S. 1124 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1992-02-24 Docket No. 91-282; No. 91-388; No. 91-541; No. 91-561; No. 91-616; No. 91-635; No. 91-654; No. 91-5440; No. 91-5586; No. 91-5597; No. 91-5604; No. 91-5721; No. 91-5810; No. 91-5852; No. 91-5977; No. 91-5981; No. 91-6013; No. 91-6014; No. 91-6039; No. 91-6059; No. 91-6094; No. 91-6110; No. 91-6129; No. 91-6144; No. 91-6169; No. 91-6178; No. 91-6208; No. 91-6210; No. 91-6224; No. 91-6245; No. 91-6336; No. 91-6389 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1124
No. 91-282.
No. 91-388.
No. 91-541.
No. 91-561.
No. 91-616.
No. 91-635.
No. 91-654.
No. 91-5440.
No. 91-5586.
No. 91-5597.
No. 91-5604.
No. 91-5721.
No. 91-5810.
No. 91-5852.
No. 91-5977.
No. 91-5981.
No. 91-6013.
No. 91-6014.
No. 91-6039.
No. 91-6059.
No. 91-6094.
No. 91-6110.
No. 91-6129.
Halas v. Department of Energy, Powell v. United States, Manes v. New Mexico, Uberoi v. University of Colorado et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner et al., Diller v. Selvin & Weiner, Cafaro v. New York, Stripling v. Georgia, In re Seagrave, McCallum et ux. v. United States, Irvin v. Kentucky, Taxey v. Illinois, Williams v. United States Postal Service et al., Martin v. Knox et al., Haugen v. Brady et al.; and Haugen v. Clark County, Nevada, et al., Kaffenberger v. City of Bullhead, Arizona, et al., Argentina v. DeBenedictus, Boyd v. Town of Cabot, Arkansas, et al., Portnoy v. United States Postal Service et al., Reed v. Belew, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, et al., Stevens v. Ohio et al., Dokes v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Dowling v. Kamber et al.,

ante, p. 953;

ante, p. 981;

ante, p. 942;

ante, p. 982;

ante, p. 1013;

ante, p. 1005;

ante, p. 985;

ante, p. 1028;

ante, p. 970;

ante, p. 995;

ante, p. 945;

ante, p. 1006;

ante, p. 999;

ante, p. 974;

ante, p. 987;

ante, p. 988;

ante, p. 989;

ante, p. 1015;

ante, p. 1007;

p. 1125
Lomelino v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corp. et al., Baker v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, Attorneys at Law, P. C., Martin v. Knox et al., Borysiak et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Clark v. United States, In re Williams, Johnson v. Peterson, Cerven v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board of California, Lamasney v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services,

No. 91-6144.

No. 91-6169.

No. 91-6178.

No. 91-6208.

No. 91-6210.

No. 91-6224.

No. 91-6245.

No. 91-6336.

No. 91-6389.

ante, p. 990;

ante, p. 1008;

ante, p. 1015;

ante, p. 1016;

ante, p. 992;

ante, p. 1028;

ante, p. 1039;

ante, p. 1041; and

ante, p. 1042. Petitions for rehearing denied.