← Cases

Connecticut v. New Hampshire

504 U.S. 905 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1992-05-18 Docket No. 119 English

Judges Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 905
No. 119,
Orig.
Connecticut et al. v. New Hampshire.

Syllabus

[For earlier order herein, see, e.g., 503 U. S. 1002 .]

Motions of Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel and United Illuminating Co. et al. for leave to intervene referred to the Special Master.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Cases cited

  • 503 U. S. 1002 503 U. S. 1002 p. 905