Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies 506 U.S. 1019

← Cases

Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies

506 U.S. 1019 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1992-12-07 Docket No. 92-6265 English

Judges Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Decision Majority (1) · Dissent — Blackmun J.

Contents
p. 1019
No. 92-6265.
Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 28, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cases cited