Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Medina v. Kansas 506 U.S. 810

← Cases

Medina v. Kansas

506 U.S. 810 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1992-10-05 Docket No. 91-8579; No. 91-8581; No. 91-8773; No. 92-5047; No. 92-5205; No. 92-5384 English

Decision Majority · Dissent — Blackmun J.

Contents

Majority

p. 810
No. 91-8579.
No. 91-8581.
No. 91-8773.
Medina v. Kansas. McDonald v. Yellow Cab Metro, Inc. Quinn v. Feltham et al.

Ct. App. Kan.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

C. A. 2d Cir.;

Dissent — Blackmun J.

p. 811
Oyegbola v. United States. Schultz et ux. v. Parr Elevator, Inc. Carver v. Carver et al.

No. 92-5047.

No. 92-5205.

No. 92-5384.

C. A. 1st Cir.;

C. A. 7th Cir.; and

C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cases cited

  • 464 U. S. 928 464 U. S. 928 p. 811