← Cases

Withrow v. Williams

509 U.S. 933 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1993-06-28 Docket No. 91-1030; No. 92-259; No. 92-1512; No. 92-1551; No. 92-1565; No. 92-1724; No. 92-7249; No. 92-7893; No. 92-7955; No. 92-7958; No. 92-7974; No. 92-8009; No. 92-8092; No. 92-8103; No. 92-8107; No. 92-8259 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 933
No. 91-1030.
No. 92-259.
No. 92-1512.
Withrow v. Williams, Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation, Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricul

507 U. S. 680 ; 508 U. S. 114 ;

p. 934
tural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Monroe Auto Equipment Company Unit of Local 878, In re McDonald, Seltzer v. Office of Personnel Management, DiNola v. Stewart et al., Holly v. True, Warden, et al., Beaumont et al. v. United States, Vey v. Wolfe, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Hughes v. Borgert, Warden, Mix v. City of Hazel Park et al., Morrison v. Estelle, Warden, Raphlah v. Texas, In re Harris, Watts v. Mazurkiewicz, Warden, et al., Dempsey v. Harshbarger, Attorney General of Massachusetts,

508 U. S. 931 ; 508 U. S. 905 ; 508 U. S. 911 ; 508 U. S. 961 ; 508 U. S. 914 ; 507 U. S. 1054 ; 508 U. S. 918 ; 508 U. S. 918 ; 508 U. S. 919 ; 508 U. S. 920 ; 508 U. S. 922 ; 508 U. S. 905 ; 508 U. S. 923 ; and 508 U. S. 943 .

No. 92-1551.

No. 92-1565.

No. 92-1724.

No. 92-7249.

No. 92-7893.

No. 92-7955.

No. 92-7958.

No. 92-7974.

No. 92-8009.

No. 92-8092.

No. 92-8103.

No. 92-8107.

No. 92-8259.

Petitions for rehearing denied.

Cases cited