Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Baker v. Runyon 513 U.S. 1066

← Cases

Baker v. Runyon

513 U.S. 1066 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1994-12-12 Docket No. 93-9113; No. 93-9145; No. 93-9231; No. 93-9379; No. 93-9578; No. 93-9658; No. 94-5013; No. 94-5021; No. 94-5100; No. 94-5498; No. 94-5588; No. 94-5612; No. 94-5661; No. 94-5677; No. 94-5838; No. 94-5945; No. 94-6066; No. 94-6090; No. 94-6316 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1066
No. 93-9113.
No. 93-9145.
No. 93-9231.
No. 93-9379.
No. 93-9578.
No. 93-9658.
No. 94-5013.
No. 94-5021.
No. 94-5100.
No. 94-5498.
No. 94-5588.
No. 94-5612.
No. 94-5661.
No. 94-5677.
No. 94-5838.
No. 94-5945.
No. 94-6066.
No. 94-6090.
No. 94-6316.
Baker v. Runyon, Postmaster General, et al., Rodenbaugh v. Knisley et al., Whitney v. Cruz et al., Barton v. United States, Lang v. Department of Health and Human Services, Friday v. United States, Harris v. Hatfield, Warden, Peabody v. Arizona, Braggs v. Mobile County Health Department et al., Rae v. District of Columbia et al., Krall v. Department of the Air Force et al., Hale v. Florida, Greenlaw v. Smith, Pugh v. Butterworth et al., Lekan v. American Energy Services, Inc., Curiale et ux. v. Andrus, Governor of Idaho, et al., Hoekel v. Plumbing Planning Corp., Davis v. Louisiana, In re Liggins,

ante, p. 833;

ante, p. 834;

ante, p. 837;

ante, p. 843;

ante, p. 854;

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 879;

ante, p. 880;

ante, p. 884;

ante, p. 904;

ante, p. 967;

ante, p. 909;

ante, p. 935;

ante, p. 936;

ante, p. 952;

ante, p. 971;

ante, p. 974;

ante, p. 975; and

ante, p. 985. Petitions for rehearing denied.