Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc. 516 U.S. 233

← Cases

Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

516 U.S. 233 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1996-01-16 Docket No. 94-2003 English

Judges Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 233
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC.
No. 94-2003.
Argued January 8,1996
Decided January 16, 1996
Henry B. Gutman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kerry L. Konrad, Jeffrey E. Ostrow, Arthur R. Miller, Neal D. Goldman, and Donald J. Rosenberg.
Gary L. Reback argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Michael Barclay, Susan A. Creighton, and Katherine L. Parks.[1]

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

p. 234
Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.