Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough — 531 U.S. 804

Majority

p. 804

No. 99-9947.

Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough et al.; Mikkilineni v. Amwest Surety Insurance Co. et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Gibson-Thomas Engineering et al.; Mikkilineni v. Indiana County Transit Authority et al.; Mikkilineni v. Borough of Forest Hills et al.; and Mikkilineni v. Mallory et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this • Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4 , and cases cited therein. Reported below: 216 F. 3d 1076 judgments); 215 F. 3d 1315 (fourth and fifth judgments).

Cases cited

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals 506 U. S. 1 SCOTUS 1992-11-02 at 4 p. 804
216 F. 3d 1076 216 F. 3d 1076 p. 804
215 F. 3d 1315 215 F. 3d 1315 p. 804