Hyperlawhypertext legal database Swoyer v. Kercher 536 U.S. 976

← Cases

Swoyer v. Kercher

536 U.S. 976 Court SCOTUS Decision date 2002-08-05 Docket No. 00-9545; No. 00-9551; No. 00-9554; No. 00-9686; No. 00-9726; No. 00-10271; No. 00-10422; No. 01-144; No. 01-400; No. 01-1277; No. 01-1299; No. 01-1367; No. 01-1379; No. 01-1391; No. 01-1430; No. 01-1448; No. 01-1526; No. 01-1539; No. 01-5074; No. 01-6035; No. 01-7219; No. 01-7844; No. 01-7926; No. 01-8315; No. 01-8404; No. 01-8431; No. 01-8445; No. 01-8596; No. 01-8809; No. 01-8823; No. 01-8828; No. 01-8832; No. 01-8843; No. 01-8875; No. 01-8911; No. 01-8970; No. 01-8983; No. 01-9045; No. 01-9050; No. 01-9059; No. 01-9071; No. 01-9075; No. 01-9083; No. 01-9108; No. 01-9160; No. 01-9180; No. 01-9223; No. 01-9257; No. 01-9274; No. 01-9283; No. 01-9327; No. 01-9391; No. 01-9393; No. 01-9416; No. 01-9437; No. 01-9475; No. 01-9502; No. 01-9507; No. 01-9532; No. 01-9566; No. 01-9567; No. 01-9619; No. 01-9624; No. 01-9663; No. 01-9682; No. 01-9731; No. 01-9819; No. 01-9832; No. 01-9884; No. 01-10013; No. 01-10094; No. 01-10166 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 976
No. 00-9545.
No. 00-9551.
No. 00-9554.
No. 00-9686.
No. 00-9726.
No. 00-10271.
No. 00-10422.
No. 01-144.
No. 01-400.
No. 01-1277.
No. 01-1299.
No. 01-1367.
No. 01-1379.
No. 01-1391.
No. 01-1430.
No. 01-1448.
No. 01-1526.
No. 01-1539.
No. 01-5074.
No. 01-6035.
No. 01-7219.
No. 01-7844.
No. 01-7926.
No. 01-8315.
No. 01-8404.
No. 01-8431.
No. 01-8445.
No. 01-8596.
Swoyer v. Kercher et al., Swoyer v. Merchants Bank, Swoyer v. Reed, Baez v. Hall et al., Swoyer v. Edgars et al., Jaramillo v. Pinkerton et al., Yon v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Fulton County, Georgia, et al. v. Flanigan’s Enterprises, Inc. of Georgia, et al., Bell, Warden v. Cone, Krilich v. United States, Watts v. City of Norman, Barnett v. Denver Publishing Co., dba Rocky Mountain News, Inc., Spanagel v. Supportive Care Services, Inc., Smith v. Friedman et al., Sienkiewicz v. Hart et al., Hagenbuch et al. v. Compaq Computer Corp. et al., Brown v. City of Wilmington et al., Sudarsky v. City of New York et al., Hicks v. Snyder, Warden, Tayborn v. Scott, Warden, Mitchell v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, Moreno v. Methodist Hospitals, Inc., Hedrick v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Manley v. Indiana, ben Yisrayl, aka Cannon v. Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Davis v. Davis, Osayande v. United States, Barreiro v. United States,

534 U. S. 831 ;

534 U. S. 832 ;

535 U. S. 904 ;

534 U. S. 849 ;

534 U. S. 857 ;

ante, p. 904;

535 U. S. 685 ;

535 U. S. 1055 ;

535 U. S. 1056 ;

535 U. S. 1078 ;

535 U. S. 1057 ;

535 U. S. 1097 ;

535 U. S. 1112 ;

ante, p. 906;

ante, p. 918;

534 U. S. 901 ;

534 U. S. 965 ;

535 U. S. 933 ;

535 U. S. 957 ;

535 U. S. 959 ;

535 U. S. 998 ;

535 U. S. 1001 ;

535 U. S. 1020 ;

535 U. S. 962 ;

535 U. S. 1099 ;

p. 977
Rowell v. Nevada, Abdullah v. United States, Teague v. Holiday Inn Express et al., Cook v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Morris v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (two judgments), Banks v. Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al., Metts v. North Carolina Department of Revenue, DuBose v. Kelly et al., Horner v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Menchaca v. Butler, Chief Deputy Warden, et al., Tshiwala v. Maryland, Williams v. United States, Manley v. Monroe County Sheriff’s Department et al., Doerr v. City of Redlands et al., Cole v. Carr et al., Taylor v. Reddish, Warden, Hegwood v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Nabelek v. Texas (two judgments), In re Williams, Vivone v. Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center, Jones v. Luebbers, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, In re Nabelek (three judgments), Chambers v. Turley et al., Trice v. Hall, Warden,

No. 01-8809.

No. 01-8823.

No. 01-8828.

No. 01-8832.

No. 01-8843.

No. 01-8875.

No. 01-8911.

No. 01-8970.

No. 01-8983.

No. 01-9045.

No. 01-9050.

No. 01-9059.

No. 01-9071.

No. 01-9075.

No. 01-9083.

No. 01-9108.

No. 01-9160.

No. 01-9180.

No. 01-9223.

No. 01-9257.

No. 01-9274.

No. 01-9283.

No. 01-9327.

No. 01-9391.

535 U. S. 1060 ;

535 U. S. 1004 ;

535 U. S. 1061 ;

535 U. S. 1024 ;

535 U. S. 1099 ;

535 U. S. 1062 ;

535 U. S. 1064 ;

535 U. S. 1080 ;

535 U. S. 1082 ;

535 U. S. 1065 ;

535 U. S. 1010 ;

535 U. S. 1083 ;

535 U. S. 1100 ;

535 U. S. 1101 ;

535 U. S. 1077 ;

535 U. S. 1086 ;

535 U. S. 1066 ;

535 U. S. 1103 ;

535 U. S. 1114 ;

535 U. S. 1116 ;

p. 978
McDowell v. Cornell Corrections et al., Moultrie v. United States, Burnett v. Tenet Healthsystem Hospitals, Inc., dba Lutheran Medical Center, Carroll v. Pfeffer, Deavault v. United States, Natera-Sosa v. United States, Abdur’Rahman v. Tennessee, McCoy v. Indiana, Nixon v. United States, Mejias Negron v. United States, Nicolaison v. Milczart et al., Marcello et ux. v. Maine Department of Human Services, Ashton v. United States, Armstrong v. City of Greensboro et al., Williams v. United States, Holub v. United States, Nagy v. United States, Blackburn v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Dix v. United States, Lockett v. United States,

No. 01-9393.

No. 01-9416.

No. 01-9437.

No. 01-9475.

No. 01-9502.

No. 01-9507.

No. 01-9532.

No. 01-9566.

No. 01-9567.

No. 01-9619.

No. 01-9624.

No. 01-9663.

No. 01-9682.

No. 01-9731.

No. 01-9819.

No. 01-9832.

No. 01-9884.

No. 01-10013.

No. 01-10094.

No. 01-10166.

535 U. S. 1116 ;

535 U. S. 1067 ;

535 U. S. 1104 ;

ante, p. 907;

535 U. S. 1069 ;

535 U. S. 1070 ;

ante, p. 925;

535 U. S. 1071 ;

535 U. S. 1086 ;

ante, p. 910;

ante, p. 920;

535 U. S. 1087 ;

ante, p. 930;

535 U. S. 1106 ;

535 U. S. 1090 ;

535 U. S. 1107 ;

ante, p. 911;

ante, p. 913; and

ante, p. 915. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Cases cited