Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson 539 U.S. 111

← Cases

Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson

539 U.S. 111 Court SCOTUS Decision date 2003-06-09 Docket No. 02-271 English

Judges Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Delivered by *112 Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 111
DOW CHEMICAL CO. et al. v. STEPHENSON et al.
No. 02-271.
Argued February 26, 2003
Decided June 9, 2003
Seth P. Waxman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Louis R. Cohen, Andrew L. Frey, Philip Allen Lacovara, Charles A. Rothfeld, Rickard B. Katslcee, Michele L. Odorizzi, Steven Brock, and John C. Sabetta.
Gerson H. Smoger argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Mark R. Cuker and Ronald Simon.[1]

With respect to respondents Joe Isaacson and Phyllis Lisa Isaacson, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U. S. 28 (2002).

With respect to respondents Daniel Raymond Stephenson, Susan Stephenson, Daniel Anthony Stephenson, and Emily Elizabeth Stephenson, the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases cited