Hyperlawhypertext legal database PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing 564 U.S. 1058

← Cases

PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing

564 U.S. 1058 Court SCOTUS Decision date 2011-08-15 Docket No. 09-993; No. 09-1039; No. 09-1501; No. 10-179; No. 10-1254; No. 10-1260; No. 10-1272; No. 10-1274; No. 10-1275; No. 10-1277; No. 10-1313; No. 10-1315; No. 10-1352; No. 10-7592; No. 10-8294; No. 10-8988; No. 10-9069; No. 10-9085; No. 10-9153; No. 10-9215; No. 10-9235; No. 10-9314; No. 10-9334; No. 10-9341; No. 10-9389; No. 10-9407; No. 10-9428; No. 10-9481; No. 10-9490; No. 10-9516; No. 10-9572; No. 10-9578; No. 10-9625; No. 10-9706; No. 10-9710; No. 10-9720; No. 10-9787; No. 10-9813; No. 10-9816; No. 10-9829; No. 10-9884; No. 10-9893; No. 10-10005; No. 10-10068; No. 10-10095; No. 10-10096; No. 10-10103; No. 10-10104; No. 10-10155; No. 10-10163; No. 10-10166; No. 10-10228; No. 10-10243; No. 10-10327; No. 10-10461; No. 10-10601 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1058
No. 09-993.
No. 09-1039.
No. 09-1501.
No. 10-179.
PLIVA, Inc., et al. v. Mensing, Actavis Elizabeth, LLC v. Mensing, Actavis, Inc. v. Demahy, Stern, Executor of the Estate of Marshall v. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of Marshall,

ante, p. 604; ante, p. 604; ante, p. 604; ante, p. 462;

p. 1059
Parker v. Richmond County Board of Education, Gard et ux. v. City of Omaha, Nebraska, Talley v. Housing Authority of Columbus, Georgia, et al., Agnew v. Sussex Condominium Unit Owners Assn., Constant v. California ex rel. Department of Transportation, Campbell v. Kellermyer Building Services, LLC, Clellan v. Ohio, Edwards v. District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility, Wadsworth et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Doe v. United States, Cato v. Swarthout, Warden, Fuller v. Smith, Monroe v. Krippel et al., Spencer v. Alabama, Simon v. City of Atlanta, Georgia, et al., Matsuda v. Hawaii et al., Smith v. Buss, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Henry v. Alabama et al., Ross v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, Quattrocchi v. Florida, Van Zant v. Florida Parole Commission et al., Boczkowski v. Jackson et al., Crisdon v. New Jersey Department of Education, Lytle v. North Carolina, Weinrich v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Pettus v. United States et al.,

ante, p. 1019; ante, p. 1005; ante, p. 1020; 563 U. S. 1022 ; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1039; 563 U. S. 1022 ; 563 U. S. 1034 ; ante, p. 1005; 563 U. S. 1035 ; 563 U. S. 943 ; 563 U. S. 1009 ; ante, p. 1022; 563 U. S. 964 ; 563 U. S. 977 ; 563 U. S. 977 ; 563 U. S. 992 ; ante, p. 1006; 563 U. S. 992 ; 563 U. S. 993 ; 563 U. S. 994 ; 563 U. S. 994 ; 563 U. S. 995 ; 563 U. S. 995 ; ante, p. 1023;

No. 10-1254.

No. 10-1260.

No. 10-1272.

No. 10-1274.

No. 10-1275.

No. 10-1277.

No. 10-1313.

No. 10-1315.

No. 10-1352.

No. 10-7592.

No. 10-8294.

No. 10-8988.

No. 10-9069.

No. 10-9085.

No. 10-9153.

No. 10-9215.

No. 10-9235.

No. 10-9314.

No. 10-9334.

No. 10-9341.

No. 10-9389.

No. 10-9407.

No. 10-9428.

No. 10-9481.

No. 10-9490.

No. 10-9516.

p. 1060
Heinonen v. Scott, Simon v. Georgia et al., Hall v. Berghuis, Warden, Harris v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College, Goodman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Digsby v. Buss, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Karupaiyan et al. v. Brown et al., Crim v. Bayshore of Naples, Inc., Hamilton v. United States, Heade v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Talley v. City of Atlantic City, New Jersey, et al., Bozic v. Pennsylvania, Davis v. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, McPherron v. Dailing et al., Figura Torrefranca v. Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.; and Figura Torrefranca v. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., Woodward v. Kansas, Blanchard v. Bennett et al., Botany v. Huibregtse, Warden, Book v. Mendoza et al., Burgin v. LaHaye et al., Akbar v. Padula, Warden, Brestle v. United States, Brewington v. Walsh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al., In re Poirier, Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co.,

563 U. S. 1010 ; 563 U. S. 1010 ; 563 U. S. 996 ; 563 U. S. 1024 ; 563 U. S. 1012 ; 563 U. S. 1024 ; 563 U. S. 1036 ; 563 U. S. 1036 ; 563 U. S. 981 ; 563 U. S. 1037 ; 563 U. S. 1037 ; 563 U. S. 1025 ; 563 U. S: 1038; ante, p. 1030; ante, p. 1025; 563 U. S. 1038 ; 563 U. S. 1014 ; 563 U. S. 1038 ; ante, p. 1042; 563 U. S. 1038 ; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1043; 563 U. S. 1039 ; 563 U. S. 1020 ; ante, p. 1043; and

No. 10-9572.

No. 10-9578.

No. 10-9625.

No. 10-9706.

No. 10-9710.

No. 10-9720.

No. 10-9787.

No. 10-9813.

No. 10-9816.

No. 10-9829.

No. 10-9884.

No. 10-9893.

No. 10-10005.

No. 10-10068.

No. 10-10095.

No. 10-10096.

No. 10-10103.

No. 10-10104.

No. 10-10155.

No. 10-10163.

No. 10-10166.

No. 10-10228.

No. 10-10243.

No. 10-10327.

No. 10-10461.

p. 1061
Hines v. United States,

ante, p. 1029. Petitions for rehearing denied.

No. 10-10601.

Cases cited