Hyperlawhypertext legal database Cunningham v. McCluskey 568 U.S. 1020

← Cases

Cunningham v. McCluskey

568 U.S. 1020 Court SCOTUS Decision date 2012-11-13 Docket No. 11-1328; No. 11-10174; No. 11-10244; No. 11-10451; No. 11-10776; No. 11-10788; No. 11-10910; No. 12-39; No. 12-5239; No. 12-5322; No. 12-5482; No. 12-5517 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1020
No. 11-1328.
No. 11-10174.
No. 11-10244.
No. 11-10451.
No. 11-10776.
No. 11-10788.
No. 11-10910.
No. 12-39.
No. 12-5239.
No. 12-5322.
No. 12-5482.
No. 12-5517.
Cunningham v. McCluskey et al., Coulter v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Adkins v. Armstrong et al., Rodriguez v. Peters, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Neng Por Yang v. City of Shakopee, Minnesota, et al., Neng Por Yang v. Hanson et al., Bak v. Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al., Selgas et ux. v. Henderson County Appraisal District, Dang v. Solar Turbines Inc., Vickerman v. Bixler et al., Abram v. Gerry, Warden, Evans v. United States,

ante, p. 816;

ante, p. 835;

ante, p. 837;

ante, p. 844;

ante, p. 861;

ante, p. 862;

ante, p. 868;

ante, p. 884;

ante, p. 902;

ante, p. 907;

ante, p. 914; and

ante, p. 916. Petitions for rehearing denied.