Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re Muthukumar 568 U.S. 1025

← Cases

In re Muthukumar

568 U.S. 1025 Court SCOTUS Decision date 2012-11-26 Docket No. 12-6269; No. 12-6314; No. 12-6322; No. 12-6398; No. 12-6554 English

Delivered by Majority

Contents

Majority

p. 1025
No. 12-6269.
No. 12-6314.
No. 12-6322.
No. 12-6398.
No. 12-6554.
In re Muthukumar; Borg v. Minnesota. Parham v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. et al. Conti v. Texas. Emerson et vir v. Aly et al.

Sup. Ct. Minn.;

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist.; and

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until December 17, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.