Majority
et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for
the ninth circuit
No. 23–970. Argued November 13,2024—Decided December 11,2024 Certioraridismissed. Reported below: 81 F. 4th 918.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Neal Kumar Katyal argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefswere Katherine B. Wellington, William E. Havemann, Reedy C. Swanson, Sarah M. Lightdale, Patrick J. Hayden, John C. Dwyer, Patrick E. Gibbs, Samantha A. Kirby, and Kathleen R. Hartnett.
Deepak Gupta argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefwere Jonathan E. Taylor, Gregory A. Beck, Eric F. Citron, Jennifer D. Bennett, Salvatore J. Graziano, and Andrew L. Zivitz.
Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak argued the cause forthe United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With her on the briefwere Solicitor General Prelogar, Deputy Solicitor General Stewart, Michael A. Conley, and Daniel Staroselsky.*
*Briefsofamici curiae urging reversalwere filedforthe AtlanticLegal Foundation by Lawrence S. Ebner; for the DigitalChamber by Frank Scaduto, Kevin B. Muhlendorf, and Krystal B. Swendsboe; forthe Washington Legal Foundation et al.by James N. Kramer and Daniel A. Ru-bens; and forJoseph A. Grundfest by Christopher G. Michel.
Briefsof amici curiae urging affirmancewere filedfor the American Associationfor Justiceby Robert S. Peck and Jeffrey R. White; for the Anti-Fraud Coalitionby Tejinder Singh; forCertain InstitutionalInves-torsby Paul Bland; forQuantitativeExperts by John Paul Schnapper-Page Proof Pending Publication
Page Proof Pending Publication
Briefsof amici curiae were filedforFormer SEC Officialsby Samuel H. Rudman, Daniel P . Chiplock, and Michael J. Miarmi; for Brian T. Fitzpatrickby Javier Bleichmar and Joseph A. Fonti; and for Thomas
FullerOgden, pro se. Page Proof Pending Publication
Page Proof Pending Publication
The attached opinionhas been revised to reflectthe usual publication and citationstyleof the United States Reports. The revisedpagination makes availablethe officialUnited States Reports citationin advance of publication.The syllabushas been prepared by the Reporter ofDecisions forthe convenienceofthe reader and constitutesno part ofthe opinionof the Court. A listof counselwho argued or filedbriefsin thiscase,and who were members of the bar of thisCourt at the time thiscase was argued, has been insertedfollowingthe syllabus. Other revisionsmay includeadjustments to formatting,captions,citationform, and any errant punctuation. The followingadditionaleditswere made: None
Page Proof Pending Publication
Page Proof Pending Publication
Cases cited
- 81 F. 4 81 F. 4 p. 20