Kempner v. Churchill

Syllabus

A'sale of personal property, made much below its cost,.by a man indebted to near or quite the extent of all he had, set aside as a fraud on creditors ; it having been made within a month after the property was bought, and before it was yet paid for; made, moreover, on Saturday, while the account of stock was taken on Sunday (the parties being Jews), and the property carried off early on Monday. ’

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the District of Northern Illinois, in which court, Churchill and others, merchants of New1 'tf’ork, and judgment creditors of one Levison,'filed a bill against a certain Kempner (Levison being impleaded), to set aside a purchase of a whole stock of dry goods which the bill alleged that Kempner, confederating and colluding with Levison how to cheat the complainant, and to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of Levison, had proposed to purchase, and had purchased of Levison, for a greatly inadequate consideration, to wit: for fifty-five cents on the dollar.

It appeared, from the testimony, that Levison, who kept a clothing store in Chicago, and had, at the time, a stock of clothes there, wrnrth $600Q, went on, about the middle of Match, 1866, to New York, where, according to the testimony, he enjoyed the reputation of “ a responsible, paying, first-class customer,” and there laid in ah additional quantity, which he purchased on credit, and which cost him $11,622 more. The new goods were forwarded to Chicago; and the whole stock thus cost $17,622. .The circumstances attending the sale were thus testified to by Levison:

The sale was made on the 8th of April, 1866. I came back from New York about the 22d of March, 1866. I was in Chicago some few days; Mr. Kempner came in the store one day, shook hand's, and said he had an idea of going to Omaha to open business, and, if he could buy a cheap stock of goods, he would take

them up there; that was on Saturday, a week before the sale. I told him I had a pretty good stock of goods here that I would sell him, as I had a chance to go into something that would pay me better than this business just now. He said he would see, and come in to-morrow with, his brother-in-law, and look over the goods, as he was a better judge of goods and prices than he was. On the following day, he came in with David Adams, and they did look over the stock, and he said he would go home and think about it, and come in to-morrow and see-me. The next day, he came in and offered me fifty-five cents on the dollar. I got pretty mad at that, and told him seventy cents would not buy them, and went off and left him. A day or two after-wards, he came in again, and we had a talk, and he said the goods were not worth more than that to him, and he had taken advice with some friends, who told him that goods were not worth as much then as they were at the time I bought them, and my credit was not very good in New York, so I had to pay ten or fifteen per cent, more than any one else. He said he wanted to make something on them; he would have to sell them on credit, and wait for his money. I told him it was no such thing, that I did "not pay more than any one else; that he might go around town and inquire,/and make himself familiar with the prices, and he could find out. I told him it did not make any difference, that that money would not buy them, and I expected to hear from another gentleman in the country, who wanted to go into business in Chicago, and I would, probably, sell out to him; that ended the conversation that day. The next day, I think it was, T met Mr.. Kempner and asked him why he circulated the reports around that he had offered me fifty-five cents, and that/ I was going to sell out. , He said he did not circulate any reports, but he would take me in and show me a good honest man, who would tell me where those reports came from. I went in with him to David Witowsky’s fur store, on Lake Street; Witowsky said he had heard reports, hut could not toll where they came from. We three stood and talked about the value of the goods. I went out after a while and went home to the store. In the afternoon, Mr. Kempner was passing by, and I called him in. We had some talk there about business. Ho said to me, ‘ There is some pretty rough talk in town about you; you had better not delay this matter; you had better let me have the goods, and put the money in your pocket, and let the credit

ors go to the devil,’ or words to that effect. I told him I would not sell them for that price anyway. He said, ‘That is my offer, and, if you can do any better, do it.’ I told him I did not see what I had to fear from the creditors; that I did not owe a,ny one anything that was due, except Freidlander, Steiteh & Co. He said, ‘ You had better look out for them, I know them better than you do.’ On Saturday, we came together again, in the store, the 7th of April, 1866. I told him I wanted to close the trade with him. I asked him to meet me half way in the offer. I. had offered them to him before for sixty-five cents; either at this time or before he had offered me fifty-five cents. He said, .‘No; he would not give any more than fifty-five cents.’ Previous to that, I told him I would sell him the fixtures in the store. He said he would not have them if he bought the stock; that he would move the goods out of the store before he paid for them, or that he would pay for them as soon as he had them out of the store: I think the last were his words; that he did not want to. have any trouble with them, for fear the creditors might replevy them. We closed the trade on Saturday, and he said he would come in on Sunday and. takeAtock. On Sundajr morning", he came in with David Witowsky, Jr., and David Adams ; I was there with Mr. Berk. Before we took stock, Mr. Kempner and I had some conversation; he asked me how much I owed Freidlander, Steiteh & Co. and several other parties. I told him I owed Freidlander, Steiteh & Co. a little over $3000, and named over some other creditors, but I don’t remember their names, or the amounts I gave. He said, ‘ Little Coleman ’ would have to suffer too. I told him I did not know that; I only owed him a little over $200, and I might pay that bill. We then went to work and took stock. When we got through taking stock, and we were starting for home, he said, ‘You had better give me the key of the store, so as to show that the goods are in my possession.’ I then gave him the key of the store, and told him I must have the money for the goods by twelve o’clock the next day. He said, you shall have it as soon as I get the goods moved. On Monday morning, I chme down to the store about nine o’clock, or between nine and ten, and the goods were already, removed.”'

The fifty-five per cent, agreed on between the parties, gave Levison $9725. The bill of the goods sold was, however,

made out on the basis of the New York cost, $17,622, and receipted accordingly. The goods were removed to a basement-story, or cellar, at some distance from the store (for the purpose, as Kempner asserted, of saving storage); and the $9725 paid in cash to Levison.

. Levison in his answer given, as in his testimony, admitted the fraud. Kempner in his, denied all fraud on his part,and represented himself as having come from California with $12,000 in gold, his only fortune; that being in Chicago he met Levison, who had also been in California, an,d whom he had known there; that Levison urged him to buy him out; that after several interviews, Levison sent for: him and accepted his offer of fifty-five cents for the dollar of cost, saying, “Well, you shall, have them. I am sick of this business; I want to be in some business in which I shall be occupied all day long doing something.” Kempner’s answer further asserted that he knew of no judgments or liens on the property, and that the purchase was not made'to forestall or delay Levison’s creditors; and it denied the conversation stated by Levison in which he, Kempner, was represented as having urged Levison to make a sale and to disregard his creditors. It asserted that the goods were worth nothing like the cost price, and that the consideration paid was not fraudulently below value, aud it charged that the complainant’s bill was filed in collusion and conspiracy with Levison, to defraud Kempner, while he, Levison, was permitted to go free, with the money paid him.

There was a great amount of testimony (the record having had 260 pages) to show fraud. Much of it was not direct, and some of it was more or less contradictory. Numerous persons were examined to show that the cost price off the goods was-too high; but they failed to show that it was so to the extent of forty-five per cent, or near it.

At- the time of the sale Levison owed about $15,000. With the cash that Kempner paid him he could show in money and furniture about $13,000, owned by himself. His wife had property.

As to the conspiracy alleged by Kempner between the