Majority
p. 111Jackson, ex dem. Bradt and others, vs. Brooks.
Headnote
This was a writ of error from the supreme court. See case and opinion of supreme court, 8 Wendell, 426, et seq.The cause was argued here by
A. C. Paige, for plaintiff in error.
M. T. Reynolds, for defendant in error.
The Chancellor read an opinion, confirming the decisions of the supreme court. Whereupon the judgment of the supreme court was affirmed by a vote of 22 for affirmance, and one for reversal.
Judgment affirmed.