Majority
p. 221Harvey and Tylee vs. Wood.
Headnote
Where, on an execution in an action of debt on judgment, sufficient is levied to satisfy the original judgment, the plaintiff must apply the money levied in satisfaction of such judgment, although there be not enough to discharge the costs as well as the debt recovered by the second judgment.Demurrer to declaration. The declaration is on a sci-re facias to revive a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs against the defendant for $215,99 in asumpsit. The defendant pleads, 1. Jful tiel record; and 2. That the plaintiffs sued him on the judgment in which execution is now sought, and in October term, 1825, recovered a judgment for $215,99, their said debt, and also $158,79, costs of suit; that in August, 1827, an execution was sued out on the last mentioned jgjlgment, by virtue of which his lands were sold,
p. 222The plaintiffs had the right to apply the proceeds of the sale of the defendant’s lands first in satisfaction of the costs of the judgment under which the execution issued, and secondly towards satisfaction of the debt; by doing so, a portion of the debt, together with the interest thereof, remained unpaid, leaving it optional with the plaintiffs to proceed by scire facias under either judgment. A recovery of a judgment upon a former judgment is no bar to a scire facias upon the first judgment. Cro. Eliz. 817, 608. The plea shews that the whole amount of the first judgment has been collected and paid, unless the plaintiffs be permitted to apply part of the proceeds in payment of the costs of the second suit. The payment was by process of law, and the law, therefore, will apply it to that debt the payment of which is most favorable to the defendant. 9 Cowen, 747, 775, n. 9 Wheaton, 720. Suits on judgments are not favored. Every principle of policy and justice demands that the plea should be sustained.
which brought the sum of $395; and the sheriff returned that the sum of $369,50, after deducting his fees, &c. was levied upon the execution. The defendant then averred that the said sum of $369,50 fully paid and satisfied, the judgment set forth in the plaintiffs’ declaration, together with the interest thereon; wherefore he prayed judgment if the plaintiffs ought to have execution, &c. To the second plea, the plaintiffs demur.
J. Jl Spencer, for the plaintiffs;
C. P. Kirkland, for the defendant.
By the Court,
The plea is good; it shews that more than sufficient has been collected by the plaintiffs on their last judgment to satisfy the original judgment and the interest thereof. The law makes the application of the money received by the plaintiffs to the original judgment, which thereby becomes extinguished. The proceedings of the plaintiffs are oppressive by thus unnecessarily accumulating costs. The effect of the argument urged upon us by the plaintiffs would be to keep alive two judg
p. 223
merits, which might be injurious to liens obtained by other creditors subsequent to the first and prior to the second judgment
Judgment for defendant.