Versions of s. 16(2)

C-38.8 — Controlled Drugs and Substances Act · 2 versions · View current text

Historical text comes from the Justice Laws point-in-time corpus and is unofficial — not the official version.

2018-06-21 to present available View Source

Subject to sections 18 to 19.1, ~~where~~if the evidence does not establish to the satisfaction of the court that ~~the designated substance offence of which a person has been convicted was committed in relation to~~ property in respect of which an order of forfeiture would otherwise be made under subsection (1) is related to the commission of the designated substance offence of which a person is convicted or discharged, but the court is satisfied, beyond a reasonable doubt, that ~~that~~the property is non-chemical offence-related property, the court may make an order of forfeiture under subsection (1) in relation to that property.

Full text

Subject to sections 18 to 19.1, if the evidence does not establish to the satisfaction of the court that property in respect of which an order of forfeiture would otherwise be made under subsection (1) is related to the commission of the designated substance offence of which a person is convicted or discharged, but the court is satisfied, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the property is non-chemical offence-related property, the court may make an order of forfeiture under subsection (1) in relation to that property.
2002-12-31 to 2018-06-21 View Source

Subject to sections 18 to 19.1, where the evidence does not establish to the satisfaction of the court that the designated substance offence of which a person has been convicted was committed in relation to property in respect of which an order of forfeiture would otherwise be made under subsection (1) but the court is satisfied, beyond a reasonable doubt, that that property is offence-related property, the court may make an order of forfeiture under subsection (1) in relation to that property.