PL-107-206 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response To Terrorist Attacks on the United States US

Contents
Preamble

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of <<NOTE: 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response To Terrorist Attacks on the United States.>> America in Congress assembled, That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes, namely:

Title I—SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS

Title II—AMERICAN <<NOTE: American Servicemembers' Protection Act of

Section 2001 — SHORT TITLE

This title may be cited as the ``American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002''.

Section 2002 — FINDINGS

Congress makes the following findings: (1) On July 17, 1998, the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, meeting in Rome, Italy, adopted the ``Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court''. The vote on whether to proceed with the statute was 120 in favor to 7 against, with 21 countries abstaining. The United States voted against final adoption of the Rome Statute. (2) As of April 30, 2001, 139 countries had signed the Rome Statute and 30 had ratified it. Pursuant to Article 126 of the Rome Statute, the statute will enter into force on the first day of the month after the 60th day following the date on which the 60th country deposits an instrument ratifying the statute. (3) Since adoption of the Rome Statute, a Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court has met regularly to draft documents to implement the Rome Statute, including Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Elements of Crimes, and a definition of the Crime of Aggression. (4) During testimony before the Congress following the adoption of the Rome Statute, the lead United States negotiator, Ambassador David Scheffer stated that the United States could not sign the Rome Statute because certain critical negotiating objectives of the United States had not been achieved. As a result, he stated: ``We are left with consequences that do not serve the cause of international justice.''. (5) Ambassador Scheffer went on to tell the Congress that: ``Multinational peacekeeping forces operating in a country that has joined the treaty can be exposed to the Court's jurisdiction even if the country of the individual peacekeeper has not joined the treaty. Thus, the treaty purports to establish an arrangement whereby United States armed forces operating overseas could be conceivably prosecuted by the international court even if the United States has not agreed to be bound by the treaty. Not only is this contrary to the most fundamental principles of treaty law, it could inhibit the ability of the United States to use its military to meet alliance obligations and participate

in multinational operations, including humanitarian interventions to save civilian lives. Other contributors to peacekeeping operations will be similarly exposed.''. (6) Notwithstanding these concerns, President Clinton directed that the United States sign the Rome Statute on December 31, 2000. In a statement issued that day, he stated that in view of the unremedied deficiencies of the Rome Statute, ``I will not, and do not recommend that my successor submit the Treaty to the Senate for advice and consent until our fundamental concerns are satisfied''. (7) Any American prosecuted by the International Criminal Court will, under the Rome Statute, be denied procedural protections to which all Americans are entitled under the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution, such as the right to trial by jury. (8) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States should be free from the risk of prosecution by the International Criminal Court, especially when they are stationed or deployed around the world to protect the vital national interests of the United States. The United States Government has an obligation to protect the members of its Armed Forces, to the maximum extent possible, against criminal prosecutions carried out by the International Criminal Court. (9) In addition to exposing members of the Armed Forces of the United States to the risk of international criminal prosecution, the Rome Statute creates a risk that the President and other senior elected and appointed officials of the United States Government may be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court. Particularly if the Preparatory Commission agrees on a definition of the Crime of Aggression over United States objections, senior United States officials may be at risk of criminal prosecution for national security decisions involving such matters as responding to acts of terrorism, preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and deterring aggression. No less than members of the Armed Forces of the United States, senior officials of the United States Government should be free from the risk of prosecution by the International Criminal Court, especially with respect to official actions taken by them to protect the national interests of the United States. (10) Any agreement within the Preparatory Commission on a definition of the Crime of Aggression that usurps the prerogative of the United Nations Security Council under Article 39 of the charter of the United Nations to ``determine the existence of any.... act of aggression'' would contravene the charter of the United Nations and undermine deterrence. (11) It is a fundamental principle of international law that a treaty is binding upon its parties only and that it does not create obligations for nonparties without their consent to be bound. The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute and will not be bound by any of its terms. The United States will not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over United States nationals.

Section 2003 — WAIVER AND TERMINATION OF PROHIBITIONS

OF THIS TITLE.

(a) Authority To Initially Waive Sections 5 and 7.--The President is authorized to waive the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2005 and 2007 for a single period of 1 year. A waiver under this subsection may be issued only if the President at least 15 days in advance of exercising such authority-- (1) notifies the appropriate congressional committees of the intention to exercise such authority; and (2) determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that the International Criminal Court has entered into a binding agreement that-- (A) prohibits the International Criminal Court from seeking to exercise jurisdiction over the following persons with respect to actions undertaken by them in an official capacity: (i) covered United States persons; (ii) covered allied persons; and (iii) individuals who were covered United States persons or covered allied persons; and (B) ensures that no person described in subparagraph (A) will be arrested, detained, prosecuted, or imprisoned by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court.

(b) Authority To Extend Waiver of Sections 5 and 7.--The President is authorized to waive the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2005 and 2007 for successive periods of 1 year each upon the expiration of a previous waiver pursuant to subsection (a) or this subsection. A waiver under this subsection may be issued only if the President at least 15 days in advance of exercising such authority-- (1) notifies the appropriate congressional committees of the intention to exercise such authority; and (2) determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that the International Criminal Court-- (A) remains party to, and has continued to abide by, a binding agreement that-- (i) prohibits the International Criminal Court from seeking to exercise jurisdiction over the following persons with respect to actions undertaken by them in an official capacity: (I) covered United States persons; (II) covered allied persons; and (III) individuals who were covered United States persons or covered allied persons; and (ii) ensures that no person described in clause (i) will be arrested, detained, prosecuted, or imprisoned by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court; and (B) has taken no steps to arrest, detain, prosecute, or imprison any person described in clause (i) of subparagraph (A).

(c) Authority To Waive Sections 4 and 6 With Respect to an Investigation or Prosecution of a Named Individual.--The President is authorized to waive the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2004 and 2006 to the degree such prohibitions and requirements would prevent United States cooperation with

an investigation or prosecution of a named individual by the International Criminal Court. A waiver under this subsection may be issued only if the President at least 15 days in advance of exercising such authority-- (1) notifies the appropriate congressional committees of the intention to exercise such authority; and (2) determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that-- (A) a waiver pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) of the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2005 and 2007 is in effect; (B) there is reason to believe that the named individual committed the crime or crimes that are the subject of the International Criminal Court's investigation or prosecution; (C) it is in the national interest of the United States for the International Criminal Court's investigation or prosecution of the named individual to proceed; and (D) in investigating events related to actions by the named individual, none of the following persons will be investigated, arrested, detained, prosecuted, or imprisoned by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court with respect to actions undertaken by them in an official capacity: (i) Covered United States persons. (ii) Covered allied persons. (iii) Individuals who were covered United States persons or covered allied persons.

(d) Termination of Waiver Pursuant to Subsection (c).--Any waiver or waivers exercised pursuant to subsection (c) of the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2004 and 2006 shall terminate at any time that a waiver pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) of the prohibitions and requirements of sections 2005 and 2007 expires and is not extended pursuant to subsection (b). (e) Termination of Prohibitions of This Title.--The prohibitions and requirements of sections 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 shall cease to apply, and the authority of section 2008 shall terminate, if the United States becomes a party to the International Criminal Court pursuant to a treaty made under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States.

Section 2004 — PROHIBITION ON COOPERATION WITH THE

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

(a) Application.--The provisions of this section-- (1) apply only to cooperation with the International Criminal Court and shall not apply to cooperation with an ad hoc international criminal tribunal established by the United Nations Security Council before or after the date of the enactment of this Act to investigate and prosecute war crimes committed in a specific country or during a specific conflict; and (2) shall not prohibit-- (A) any action permitted under section 2008; or (B) communication by the United States of its policy with respect to a matter.

(b) Prohibition on Responding to Requests for Cooperation.-- Notwithstanding section 1782 of title 28, United States Code, or any other provision of law, no United States Court, and no

agency or entity of any State or local government, including any court, may cooperate with the International Criminal Court in response to a request for cooperation submitted by the International Criminal Court pursuant to the Rome Statute. (c) Prohibition on Transmittal of Letters Rogatory From the International Criminal Court.--Notwithstanding section 1781 of title 28, United States Code, or any other provision of law, no agency of the United States Government may transmit for execution any letter rogatory issued, or other request for cooperation made, by the International Criminal Court to the tribunal, officer, or agency in the United States to whom it is addressed. (d) Prohibition on Extradition to the International Criminal Court.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no agency or entity of the United States Government or of any State or local government may extradite any person from the United States to the International Criminal Court, nor support the transfer of any United States citizen or permanent resident alien to the International Criminal Court. (e) Prohibition on Provision of Support to the International Criminal Court.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no agency or entity of the United States Government or of any State or local government, including any court, may provide support to the International Criminal Court. (f) Prohibition on Use of Appropriated Funds To Assist the International Criminal Court.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds appropriated under any provision of law may be used for the purpose of assisting the investigation, arrest, detention, extradition, or prosecution of any United States citizen or permanent resident alien by the International Criminal Court. (g) Restriction on Assistance Pursuant to Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties.--The United States shall exercise its rights to limit the use of assistance provided under all treaties and executive agreements for mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, multilateral conventions with legal assistance provisions, and extradition treaties, to which the United States is a party, and in connection with the execution or issuance of any letter rogatory, to prevent the transfer to, or other use by, the International Criminal Court of any assistance provided by the United States under such treaties and letters rogatory. (h) Prohibition on Investigative Activities of Agents.--No agent of the International Criminal Court may conduct, in the United States or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, any investigative activity relating to a preliminary inquiry, investigation, prosecution, or other proceeding at the International Criminal Court.

Section 2005 — RESTRICTION ON UNITED STATES

PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS.

(a) Policy.--Effective beginning on the date on which the Rome Statute enters into force pursuant to Article 126 of the Rome Statute, the President should use the voice and vote of the United States in the United Nations Security Council to ensure that each resolution of the Security Council authorizing any peacekeeping operation under chapter VI of the charter of the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter VII of the charter

of the United Nations permanently exempts, at a minimum, members of the Armed Forces of the United States participating in such operation from criminal prosecution or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court for actions undertaken by such personnel in connection with the operation. (b) Restriction.--Members of the Armed Forces of the United States may not participate in any peacekeeping operation under chapter VI of the charter of the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations, the creation of which is authorized by the United Nations Security Council on or after the date that the Rome Statute enters into effect pursuant to Article 126 of the Rome Statute, unless the President has submitted to the appropriate congressional committees a certification described in subsection (c) with respect to such operation. (c) Certification.--The certification referred to in subsection (b) is a certification by the President that-- (1) members of the Armed Forces of the United States are able to participate in the peacekeeping or peace enforcement operation without risk of criminal prosecution or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court because, in authorizing the operation, the United Nations Security Council permanently exempted, at a minimum, members of the Armed Forces of the United States participating in the operation from criminal prosecution or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court for actions undertaken by them in connection with the operation; (2) members of the Armed Forces of the United States are able to participate in the peacekeeping or peace enforcement operation without risk of criminal prosecution or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court because each country in which members of the Armed Forces of the United States participating in the operation will be present either is not a party to the International Criminal Court and has not invoked the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court pursuant to Article 12 of the Rome Statute, or has entered into an agreement in accordance with Article 98 of the Rome Statute preventing the International Criminal Court from proceeding against members of the Armed Forces of the United States present in that country; or (3) the national interests of the United States justify participation by members of the Armed Forces of the United States in the peacekeeping or peace enforcement operation.

Section 2006 — PROHIBITION ON DIRECT OR INDIRECT

TRANSFER OF CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

(a) In General.--Not later than the date on which the Rome Statute enters into force, the President shall ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to prevent the transfer of classified national security information and law enforcement information to the International Criminal Court for the purpose of facilitating an investigation, apprehension, or prosecution. (b) Indirect Transfer.--The procedures adopted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be designed to prevent the transfer to the United Nations and to the government of any country that is

party to the International Criminal Court of classified national security information and law enforcement information that specifically relates to matters known to be under investigation or prosecution by the International Criminal Court, except to the degree that satisfactory assurances are received from the United Nations or that government, as the case may be, that such information will not be made available to the International Criminal Court for the purpose of facilitating an investigation, apprehension, or prosecution. (c) Construction.--The provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit any action permitted under section 2008.

Section 2007 — PROHIBITION OF UNITED STATES MILITARY

ASSISTANCE TO PARTIES TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

(a) Prohibition of Military Assistance.--Subject to subsections (b) and (c), and effective 1 year after the date on which the Rome Statute enters into force pursuant to Article 126 of the Rome Statute, no United States military assistance may be provided to the government of a country that is a party to the International Criminal Court. (b) National Interest Waiver.--The President may, without prior notice to Congress, waive the prohibition of subsection (a) with respect to a particular country if he determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that it is important to the national interest of the United States to waive such prohibition. (c) Article 98 Waiver.--The President may, without prior notice to Congress, waive the prohibition of subsection (a) with respect to a particular country if he determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that such country has entered into an agreement with the United States pursuant to Article 98 of the Rome Statute preventing the International Criminal court from proceeding against United States personnel present in such country. (d) Exemption.--The prohibition of subsection (a) shall not apply to the government of-- (1) a NATO member country; (2) a major non-NATO ally (including Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea, and New Zealand); or (3) Taiwan.

Section 2008 — AUTHORITY TO FREE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS DETAINED OR IMPRISONED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

(a) Authority.--The President is authorized to use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any person described in subsection (b) who is being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court. (b) Persons Authorized To Be Freed.--The authority of subsection (a) shall extend to the following persons: (1) Covered United States persons. (2) Covered allied persons. (3) Individuals detained or imprisoned for official actions taken while the individual was a covered United States person

or a covered allied person, and in the case of a covered allied person, upon the request of such government.

(c) Authorization of Legal Assistance.--When any person described in subsection (b) is arrested, detained, investigated, prosecuted, or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court, the President is authorized to direct any agency of the United States Government to provide-- (1) legal representation and other legal assistance to that person (including, in the case of a person entitled to assistance under section 1037 of title 10, United States Code, representation and other assistance in the manner provided in that section); (2) exculpatory evidence on behalf of that person; and (3) defense of the interests of the United States through appearance before the International Criminal Court pursuant to Article 18 or 19 of the Rome Statute, or before the courts or tribunals of any country.

(d) Bribes and Other Inducements Not Authorized.--This section does not authorize the payment of bribes or the provision of other such incentives to induce the release of a person described in subsection (b).

Section 2009 — ALLIANCE COMMAND ARRANGEMENTS

(a) Report on Alliance Command Arrangements.-- Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President should transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report with respect to each military alliance to which the United States is party-- (1) describing the degree to which members of the Armed Forces of the United States may, in the context of military operations undertaken by or pursuant to that alliance, be placed under the command or operational control of foreign military officers subject to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court because they are nationals of a party to the International Criminal Court; and (2) evaluating the degree to which members of the Armed Forces of the United States engaged in military operations undertaken by or pursuant to that alliance may be exposed to greater risks as a result of being placed under the command or operational control of foreign military officers subject to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

(b) Description of Measures To Achieve Enhanced Protection for Members of the Armed Forces of the United States.-- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President should transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a description of modifications to command and operational control arrangements within military alliances to which the United States is a party that could be made in order to reduce any risks to members of the Armed Forces of the United States identified pursuant to subsection (a)(2).

(c) Submission in Classified Form.--The report under subsection (a), and the description of measures under subsection (b), or appropriate parts thereof, may be submitted in classified form.

Section 2010 — WITHHOLDINGS

Funds withheld from the United States share of assessments to the United Nations or any other international organization during any fiscal year pursuant to section 705 of the Admiral

James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001 (as enacted by section 1000(a)(7) of Public Law 106-113; 113 Stat. 1501A-460), are authorized to be transferred to the Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance Account of the Department of State.

Section 2011 — APPLICATION OF SECTIONS 2004 AND 2006

TO EXERCISE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITIES.

(a) In General.--Sections 2004 and 2006 shall not apply to any action or actions with respect to a specific matter involving the International Criminal Court taken or directed by the President on a case-by-case basis in the exercise of the President's authority as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States under article II, section 2 of the United States Constitution or in the exercise of the executive power under article II, section 1 of the United States Constitution. (b) Notification to Congress.-- (1) In general.-- Subject to paragraph (2), not later than 15 days after the President takes or directs an action or actions described in subsection (a) that would otherwise be prohibited under section 2004 or 2006, the President shall submit a notification of such action to the appropriate congressional committees. A notification under this paragraph shall include a description of the action, a determination that the action is in the national interest of the United States, and a justification for the action. (2) Exception.--If the President determines that a full notification under paragraph (1) could jeopardize the national security of the United States or compromise a United States law enforcement activity, not later than 15 days after the President takes or directs an action or actions referred to in paragraph (1) the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees that an action has been taken and a determination has been made pursuant to this paragraph. The President shall provide a full notification under paragraph (1) not later than 15 days after the reasons for the determination under this paragraph no longer apply.

(c) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed as a grant of statutory authority to the President to take any action.

Section 2012 — NONDELEGATION

The authorities vested in the President by sections 2003 and 2011(a) may not be delegated by the President pursuant to section 301 of title 3, United States Code, or any other provision of law. The authority vested in the President by section 2005(c)(3) may not be delegated by the President pursuant to section 301 of title 3, United States Code, or any other provision of law to any official other than the Secretary of Defense, and if so delegated may not be subdelegated.

Section 2013 — DEFINITIONS

As used in this title and in section 706 of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001: (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means the Committee

on International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (2) Classified national security information.--The term ``classified national security information'' means information that is classified or classifiable under Executive Order 12958 or a successor Executive order. (3) Covered allied persons.--The term ``covered allied persons'' means military personnel, elected or appointed officials, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the government of a NATO member country, a major non-NATO ally (including Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea, and New Zealand), or Taiwan, for so long as that government is not a party to the International Criminal Court and wishes its officials and other persons working on its behalf to be exempted from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. (4) Covered united states persons.--The term ``covered United States persons'' means members of the Armed Forces of the United States, elected or appointed officials of the United States Government, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the United States Government, for so long as the United States is not a party to the International Criminal Court. (5) Extradition.--The terms ``extradition'' and ``extradite'' mean the extradition of a person in accordance with the provisions of chapter 209 of title 18, United States Code, (including section 3181(b) of such title) and such terms include both extradition and surrender as those terms are defined in Article 102 of the Rome Statute. (6) International criminal court.--The term ``International Criminal Court'' means the court established by the Rome Statute. (7) Major non-nato ally.--The term ``major non-NATO ally'' means a country that has been so designated in accordance with section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. (8) Participate in any peacekeeping operation under chapter vi of the charter of the united nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter vii of the charter of the united nations.--The term ``participate in any peacekeeping operation under chapter VI of the charter of the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations'' means to assign members of the Armed Forces of the United States to a United Nations military command structure as part of a peacekeeping operation under chapter VI of the charter of the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations in which those members of the Armed Forces of the United States are subject to the command or operational control of one or more foreign military officers not appointed in conformity with article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. (9) Party to the international criminal court.--The term ``party to the International Criminal Court'' means a government that has deposited an instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession to the Rome Statute, and has not withdrawn from the Rome Statute pursuant to Article 127 thereof.

(10) Peacekeeping operation under chapter vi of the charter of the united nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter vii of the charter of the united nations.--The term ``peacekeeping operation under chapter VI of the charter of the United Nations or peace enforcement operation under chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations'' means any military operation to maintain or restore international peace and security that-- (A) is authorized by the United Nations Security Council under chapter VI or VII of the charter of the United Nations; and (B) is paid for from assessed contributions of United Nations members that are made available for peacekeeping or peace enforcement activities. (11) Rome statute.--The term ``Rome Statute'' means the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted by the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. (12) Support.--The term ``support'' means assistance of any kind, including financial support, transfer of property or other material support, services, intelligence sharing, law enforcement cooperation, the training or detail of personnel, and the arrest or detention of individuals. (13) United states military assistance.--The term ``United States military assistance'' means-- (A) assistance provided under chapter 2 or 5 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.); or (B) defense articles or defense services furnished with the financial assistance of the United States Government, including through loans and guarantees, under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763).

Section 2014 — REPEAL OF LIMITATION

The Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2002 (division A of Public Law 107-117) is amended by striking section 8173.

Section 2015 — ASSISTANCE TO INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS

Nothing in this title shall prohibit the United States from rendering assistance to international efforts to bring to justice Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosovic, Osama bin Laden, other members of Al Queda, leaders of Islamic Jihad, and other foreign nationals accused of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity.

Title III—OTHER MATTERS

Section 3001 — AMENDMENTS TO THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT

Section 213(b)(2)(A) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (title II of Public Law 98-67; 19 U.S.C. 2703(b)(2)(A)) is amended-- (1) in clause (i), by adding at the end the following: ``Apparel articles shall qualify under the preceding sentence only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled, if the fabrics are knit fabrics, is carried out in the United States. Apparel

articles shall qualify under the first sentence of this clause only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled, if the fabrics are woven fabrics, is carried out in the United States.''; and (2) in clause (ii), by adding at the end the following: ``Apparel articles shall qualify under the preceding sentence only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled, if the fabrics are knit fabrics, is carried out in the United States. Apparel articles shall qualify under the first sentence of this clause only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled, if the fabrics are woven fabrics, is carried out in the United States.''.

(b) Andean Trade Preference Act.-- Any duty free or other preferential treatment provided under the Andean Trade Preference Act to apparel articles assembled from fabric formed in the United States shall apply to such articles only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled if the fabrics are knit fabrics, is carried out in the United States. Any duty-free or other preferential treatment provided under the Andean Trade Preference Act to apparel articles assembled from fabric formed in the United States shall apply to such articles only if all dyeing, printing, and finishing of the fabrics from which the articles are assembled if the fabrics are woven fabrics, is carried out in the United States.

(c) Effective Date.--Subsection (b) and the amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect-- (1) 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, or (2) September 1, 2002,

whichever occurs first.

Section 3002

<<NOTE: Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002. Alaska. Postal service.>> RURAL SERVICE IMPROVEMENT.

(a) Short Title.--This title may be cited as the ``Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002''.

(b) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings: (1) The State of Alaska is the largest State in the Union and has a very limited system of roads connecting communities. (2) Alaska has more pilots per capita than any other State in the Union. (3) Pilots flying in Alaska are often the most skilled and best-prepared pilots in the world. (4) Air travel within the State of Alaska is often hampered by severe weather conditions and treacherous terrain. (5) The United States Government owns nearly \2/3\ of Alaska's landmass, including large tracts of land separating isolated communities within the State. (6) Such Federal ownership has inhibited the ability of Alaskans to build roads connecting isolated communities. (7) Most communities and a large portion of the population within the State can only be reached by air. (8) The vast majority of food items and everyday necessities destined for these isolated communities and populations can only be transported through the air. (9) The Intra-Alaska Bypass Mail system, created by Congress and operated by the United States Postal Service under section 5402 of title 39, United States Code, with input from

the Department of Transportation, connecting hundreds of rural and isolated communities within the State, is a critical piece of the Alaska and the national transportation system. The system is like a 4-legged stool, designed to-- (A) provide the most affordable means of delivering food and everyday necessities to these rural and isolated communities; (B) establish a system whereby the Postal Service can meet its obligations to deliver mail to every house and business in the United States; (C) support affordable and reliable passenger service; and (D) support affordable and reliable nonmail freight service. (10) Without the Intra-Alaska Bypass Mail system-- (A) it would be difficult and more expensive for the Postal Service to meet its obligation of delivering mail to every house and business in the United States; and (B) food, medicine, freight, and everyday necessities and passenger service for these rural and isolated communities would cost several times the current level. (11) Attempts by Congress to support passenger and nonmail freight service in Alaska using the Intra-Alaska Bypass Mail system have yielded some positive results, but some carriers have been manipulating the system by carrying few, if any, passengers and little nonmail freight while earning most of their revenues from the carriage of nonpriority bypass mail. (12) As long as the Federal Government continues to own large tracts of land within the State of Alaska which impede access to isolated communities, it is in the best interest of the Postal Service, the residents of Alaska and the United States-- (A) to ensure that the Intra-Alaska Bypass Mail system remains strong, viable, and affordable for the Postal Service; (B) to ensure that residents of rural and isolated communities in Alaska continue to have affordable, reliable, and safe passenger service; (C) to ensure that residents of rural and isolated communities in Alaska continue to have affordable, reliable, and safe nonmail freight service; (D) to encourage that intra-Alaska air carriers move toward safer, more secure, and more reliable air transportation under the Federal Aviation Administration's guidelines and in accordance with part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, where such operations are supported by the needs of the community; and (E) that Congress, pursuant to the authority granted under Article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution to establish Post Offices and post roads, make changes to ensure that the Intra-Alaska Bypass Mail system continues to be used to support substantial passenger and nonmail freight service and to reduce costs for the Postal Service.

(c) Selection of Carriers of Nonpriority Bypass Mail to Certain Points in Alaska.--

(1) Definitions.--Section 5402 of title 39, United States Code, is amended-- (A) by striking subsection (e); (B) by redesignating subsections (a) through (d) as subsections (b) through (e), respectively; and (C) by inserting before subsection (b), as redesignated, the following:

``(a) In this section-- ``(1) the term `acceptance point' means the point at which nonpriority bypass mail originates; ``(2) the terms `air carrier', `interstate air transportation', and `foreign air transportation' have the meanings given such terms in section 40102(a) of title 49, United States Code; ``(3) the term `base fare' means the fare paid to the carrier issuing the passenger ticket or carrying nonmail freight which may entail service being provided by more than 1 carrier; ``(4) the term `bush carrier' means a carrier operating aircraft certificated within the payload capacity requirements of subsection (g)(1)(D)(i) on a city pair route; ``(5) the term `bush passenger carrier' means a passenger carrier that meets the requirements of subsection (g)(1)(D)(i) and provides passenger service on a city pair route; ``(6) the term `bush route' means an air route in which only a bush carrier is tendered nonpriority bypass mail between the origination point, being either an acceptance point or a hub, as determined by the Postal Service, and the destination city; ``(7) the term `city pair' means service between an origin and destination city pair; ``(8) the term `composite rate'-- ``(A) means a combination of mainline and bush rates paid to a bush carrier for a direct flight from an acceptance point to a bush destination beyond a hub point; and ``(B) shall be based on the mainline rate paid to the hub, plus the lowest bush rate paid to bush carriers in the State of Alaska for the distance traveled from the hub point to the destination point; ``(9) the term `equitable tender' means the practice of the Postal Service of equitably distributing mail on a fair and reasonable basis between those air carriers that offer equivalent services and costs between 2 communities in accordance with the regulations of the Postal Service; ``(10) the term `existing mainline carrier' means a mainline carrier (as defined in this subsection) that on January 1, 2001, was-- ``(A) certified under part 121; ``(B) qualified to provide mainline nonpriority bypass mail service; and ``(C) actually engaged in the carriage of mainline nonpriority bypass mail through scheduled service in the State of Alaska; ``(11) the term `mainline carrier' means a carrier operating aircraft under part 121 and certificated within the payload capacity requirements of subsection (g)(1)(D)(ii) on a given city pair route; ``(12) the term `mainline route' means a city pair in which a mainline carrier is tendered nonpriority bypass mail;

``(13) the term `new', when referencing a carrier, means a carrier that-- ``(A) meets the respective requirements of clause (i) or (ii) of subsection (g)(1)(D), depending on the type of route being served and the size of aircraft being used to provide service; and ``(B) began providing nonpriority bypass mail service on a city pair route in the State of Alaska after January 1, 2001; ``(14) the term `part 121' means part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; ``(15) the term `part 135' means part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; ``(16) the term `scheduled service' means-- ``(A) flights are operated in common carriage available to the general public under a published schedule; ``(B) flight schedules are announced in advance in systems specified by the Postal Service, in addition to the Official Airline Guide or the air cargo equivalent of that Guide; ``(C) flights depart whether full or not; and ``(D) customers contract for carriage separately on a regular basis; ``(17) the term `Secretary' means the Secretary of Transportation; ``(18) the term `121 bush passenger carrier' means a bush passenger carrier providing passenger service on bush routes under part 121; ``(19) the term `121 mainline passenger carrier' means a mainline carrier providing passenger service through scheduled service on routes under part 121; ``(20) the term `121 passenger aircraft' means an aircraft flying passengers on a city pair route that is operated under part 121; ``(21) the term `121 passenger carrier' means a passenger carrier that provides scheduled service under part 121; ``(22) the term `135 bush passenger carrier' means a bush passenger carrier providing passenger service through scheduled service on bush routes under part 135; and ``(23) the term `135 passenger carrier' means a passenger carrier that provides scheduled service under part 135.''. (2) Requirements for selection.--Section 5402(g)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is amended-- (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting after ``in the State of Alaska,'' the following: ``shall adhere to an equitable tender policy within a qualified group of carriers, in accordance with the regulations of the Postal Service, and''; (B) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``to the best'' and all that follows before the semicolon; and (C) in subparagraph (D) by inserting ``with at least 3 scheduled (noncontract) flights per week between two points'' after ``scheduled service''. (3) Application of rates.--Section 5402(g)(2) of title 39, United States Code, is amended-- (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);

(B) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting a semicolon; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(C) shall offer a bush passenger carrier providing service on a route in the State of Alaska between an acceptance point and a hub not served by a mainline carrier the opportunity to receive equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail at mainline service rates when a mainline carrier begins serving that route if the bush passenger carrier-- ``(i) meets the requirements of paragraph (1); ``(ii) provided at least 20 percent of the passenger service (as calculated in subsection (h)(5)) between such city pair for the 6 months immediately preceding the date on which the bush carrier seeks such tender; and ``(iii) continues to provide not less than 20 percent of the passenger service on the city pair while seeking such tender; ``(D) shall offer bush passenger carriers and nonmail freight carriers the opportunity to receive equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail at mainline service rates from a hub point to a destination city in the State of Alaska if the city pair is also being served by a mainline carrier and-- ``(i) for a passenger carrier-- ``(I) the carrier meets the requirements of paragraph (1); ``(II) the carrier provided at least 20 percent of the passenger service (as calculated in subsection (h)(5)) on the city pair route for the 6 months immediately preceding the date on which the carrier seeks such tender; and ``(III) the carrier continues to provide not less than 20 percent of the passenger service on the route; or ``(ii) for a nonmail freight carrier-- ``(I) the carrier meets the requirements of paragraph (1); and ``(II) the carrier provided at least 25 percent of the nonmail freight service (as calculated in subsection (i)(6)) on the city pair route for the 6 months immediately preceding the date on which the carrier seeks such tender; ``(E)(i) shall not offer equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail at mainline rates to a bush carrier operating from an acceptance point to a hub point in the State of Alaska, except as described in subparagraph (C); and ``(ii) may tender nonpriority bypass mail at bush rates to a bush carrier from an acceptance point to a hub point in the State of Alaska if the Postal Service determines that-- ``(I) the bush carrier meets the requirements of paragraph (1); ``(II) the service to be provided on such route by the bush carrier is not otherwise available through direct mainline service; and ``(III) tender of mail to such bush carrier will not decrease the efficiency of nonpriority bypass mail service (in terms of payments to all carriers providing service on the city pair route and timely delivery) for the route;

``(F) may offer tender of nonpriority bypass mail to a passenger carrier from an acceptance point to a destination city beyond a hub point in the State of Alaska at a composite rate if the Postal Service determines that-- ``(i) the carrier provides passenger service in accordance with the requirements of subsection (h)(2); ``(ii) the carrier qualifies under subsection (h) to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail out of the hub point being bypassed; ``(iii) the tender of such mail will not decrease efficiency of delivery of nonpriority bypass mail service into or out of the hub point being bypassed; and ``(iv) such tender will result in reduced payments to the carrier by the Postal Service over flying the entire route; and ``(G) notwithstanding subparagraph (F), shall offer equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail in proportion to passenger and nonmail freight mail pools described in this section between qualified passenger and nonmail freight carriers on a route from an acceptance point to a bush destination in the State of Alaska at a composite rate if-- ``(i)(I) for a passenger carrier, the carrier receiving the composite rate provided 20 percent of the passenger service on the city pair route for the 12 months immediately preceding the date on which the carrier seeks tender of such mail; or ``(II) for a nonmail freight carrier, the carrier receiving the composite rate provided at least 25 percent of the nonmail freight service for the 12 months immediately preceding the date on which the carrier seeks tender of such mail; and ``(ii)(I) nonpriority bypass mail was being tendered to a passenger carrier or a nonmail freight carrier at a composite rate on such city pair route on January 1, 2000; or ``(II) the hub being bypassed was not served by a mainline carrier on January 1, 2000.

The tender of nonpriority bypass mail under subparagraph (G) shall be on an equitable basis between the qualified carriers that provide the direct service on the city pair route and the qualified carriers that provide service between the hub point being bypassed and the destination point, based on the volume of nonpriority bypass mail on both routes.''. (4) Selection of carriers to hub points.--Section 5402(g) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(4)(A) Except as provided under subparagraph (B) and paragraph (5), the Postal Service shall select only existing mainline carriers to provide nonpriority bypass mail service between an acceptance point and a hub point in the State of Alaska. ``(B) The Postal Service may select a carrier other than an existing mainline carrier to provide nonpriority bypass mail service on a mainline route in the State of Alaska if-- ``(i) the Postal Service determines (in accordance with criteria established in advance by the Postal Service) that the mail service between the acceptance point and the hub point

is deficient and provides written notice of the determination to existing mainline carriers to the hub point; and ``(ii) after the 30-day period following issuance of notice under clause (i), including notice of inadequate capacity, the Postal Service determines that deficiencies in service to the hub point have not been eliminated.

``(5)(A) The Postal Service shall offer equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail to a new 121 mainline passenger carrier entering a mainline route in the State of Alaska, if the carrier-- ``(i) meets the requirements of subsection (g)(1)(D)(ii); and ``(ii) has provided at least 75 percent of the number of insured passenger seats as the number of available passenger seats being provided by the mainline passenger carrier providing the greatest number of available passenger seats on that route for the 6 months immediately preceding the date on which the carrier seeks tender of such mail.

``(B) A new 121 mainline passenger carrier that is tendered nonpriority mainline bypass mail under subparagraph (A)-- ``(i) shall be eligible for equitable tender of such mail only on city pair routes where the carrier meets the conditions of subparagraph (A); ``(ii) may not count the passenger service provided under subparagraph (A) toward the carrier meeting the minimum requirements of this section; and ``(iii) shall provide at least 20 percent of the passenger service (as determined for bush passenger carriers in subsection (h)(5)) on such route to remain eligible to be tendered nonpriority mainline bypass mail.

``(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) and paragraph (1)(B), a new 121 mainline passenger carrier, otherwise qualified under this subsection, may immediately receive equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to a hub point in the State of Alaska if the carrier meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A), (C), and (D) of paragraph (1) and subsection (h)(2)(B) and-- ``(i) all qualified 121 mainline passenger carriers discontinue service on the city pair route; or ``(ii) no 121 mainline passenger carrier serves the city pair route.

``(D) A carrier operating under a code share agreement on the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002 that received tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail on a city pair route in the State of Alaska may count the passenger service provided under the entire code share arrangement on such route if the code share agreement terminates. That carrier shall continue to provide at least 20 percent of the passenger service (as determined for bush passenger carriers in subsection (h)(5)) between the city pair as a 121 mainline passenger carrier while seeking such tender. ``(6)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(B), passenger carriers providing essential air service under a Department of Transportation order issued under subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United States Code, shall be tendered all nonpriority mail, in addition to all nonpriority bypass mail, by the Postal Service to destination cities in the State of Alaska served by the essential air service flights consistent with that order unless the Postal Service finds that an essential air service carrier's service does not meet the needs of the Postal Service.

``(B) Service provided under this paragraph, including service provided to points served in conjunction with service being subsidized under the Essential Air Service contract, may not be applied toward any of the minimum eligibility requirements of this section.''. (5) Selection of carriers to bush points.--Section 5402 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``(h)(1) Except as provided under paragraph (7), on a city pair route in the State of Alaska, the Postal Service shall offer equitable tender of 70 percent of the nonpriority bypass mail on the route to all carriers providing scheduled passenger service in accordance with part 121 or part 135 that-- ``(A) meet the requirements of subsection (g)(1); ``(B) provided 20 percent or more of the passenger service (as calculated in paragraph (5)) between the city pair for the 12 months preceding the date on which the 121 passenger aircraft or the 135 passenger carrier seek tender of nonpriority bypass mail; and ``(C) meet the requirements of paragraph (2).

``(2) To remain eligible for equitable tender under this subsection, the carrier or aircraft shall-- ``(A) continue to provide not less than 20 percent of the passenger service on the city pair route for which the carrier is seeking the tender of such nonpriority bypass mail; ``(B)(i) for operations under part 121, operate aircraft type certificated to carry at least 19 passengers; ``(ii) for operations under part 135, operate aircraft type certificated to carry at least 5 passengers; or ``(iii) for operations under part 135 where only a water landing is available, operate aircraft type certificated to carry at least 3 passengers; ``(C) insure all available passenger seats on the city pair route on which the carrier seeks tender of such mail; and ``(D) operate flights under its published schedule.

``(3)(A) Except as provided under subparagraph (E), if a 135 passenger carrier serves a city pair route in the State of Alaska and meets the requirements of paragraph (1) or (2) when a 121 passenger carrier becomes qualified to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail on such route with a 121 passenger aircraft in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (2), the qualifying 135 passenger carriers on that route shall convert to operations with a 121 passenger aircraft within 5 years after the 121 passenger aircraft begins receiving tender on that route in order to remain eligible for equitable tender under paragraph (1). The 135 carrier shall-- ``(i) begin the process of conversion not later than 2 years after the 121 passenger aircraft begins carrying nonpriority bypass mail on that route; and ``(ii) submit a part 121 compliance statement not later than 4 years after the 121 passenger aircraft begins carrying nonpriority bypass mail on that route.

``(B) Completion of conversion under subparagraph (A) shall not be required if all 121 passenger carriers discontinue the carriage of nonpriority bypass mail with 121 passenger aircraft on the city pair route. ``(C) Any qualified carrier operating in the State of Alaska under this section may request a waiver from subparagraph (A). Such a request, at the discretion of the Secretary, may be granted

for good cause shown. The requesting party shall state the basis for such a waiver. ``(D) If after 6 years and 3 months following the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002, a 135 passenger carrier is providing service on a city pair route in the State of Alaska and a 121 passenger aircraft becomes eligible to receive tender of nonpriority bypass mail on the route, that 135 passenger carrier shall convert to operations under part 121 within 12 months of the 121 passenger carrier being tendered nonpriority bypass mail. The Postal Service shall not continue the tender of nonpriority bypass mail to a 135 passenger carrier that fails to convert to part 121 operations within 12 months after the 121 passenger carrier being tendered such mail under this paragraph. ``(E) Notwithstanding the requirements of this subsection, if only 1 passenger carrier or aircraft is qualified to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail as a passenger carrier or aircraft on a city pair route in the State of Alaska, the Postal Service shall tender 20 percent of the nonpriority bypass mail described under paragraph (1) to the passenger carrier or aircraft providing the next highest level of passenger service on such route. ``(4) Qualification for the tender of mail under this subsection shall not be counted toward the minimum qualifications necessary to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail on any other route. ``(5)(A)(i) In this section, the percent of passenger service shall be a percentage calculated using data collected under subsection (k). ``(ii) To ensure accurate reporting of market share the Postal Service shall compare the resulting percentage under clause (i) to the lesser of-- ``(I) the amount of the passenger excise tax paid by or on behalf of a carrier, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares for passengers actually flown by a carrier from the origination point to the destination point, divided by the value of the total passenger excise taxes, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares paid by or on behalf of all passenger carriers providing service from the hub point to the bush destination point; or ``(II) the amount of half of the passenger excise tax paid by or on behalf of a carrier, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares for passengers actually flown by a carrier on the city pair route, divided by the value of the total passenger excise taxes, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares paid by or on behalf of all passenger carriers providing service between the origination point and the destination point.

``(B) For the purposes of calculating passenger service as described under subparagraph (A), a bush passenger carrier providing intervillage bush passenger service may include the carriage of passengers carried along any point of the route between the route's origination point and the final destination point. Such calculation shall be based only on the carriage of passengers on regularly scheduled flights and only on flights being flown in a direction away from the hub point. Passenger service provided on chartered flights shall not be included in the carrier's calculation of passenger service.

``(6)(A) The Secretary shall establish new bush rates for passenger carriers operating in the State of Alaska receiving tender of nonpriority bypass mail under this subsection. ``(B) The Secretary shall establish a bush rate based on data collected under subsection (k) from 121 bush passenger carriers. Such rates shall be paid to all bush passenger carriers operating on city pair routes in the State of Alaska where a 121 bush passenger carrier is tendered nonpriority bypass mail. ``(C) The Secretary shall establish a bush rate based on data collected under subsection (k) from 135 bush passenger carriers. Such rates shall be paid to all bush passenger carriers operating on bush city pair routes in the State of Alaska where no 121 bush passenger carrier is tendered nonpriority bypass mail. ``(D) The Secretary shall establish a bush rate based on data collected under subsection (k) from bush passenger carriers operating aircraft on city pair routes where only water landings are available. Such rates shall be paid to all bush passenger carriers operating on the city pair routes in the State of Alaska where only water landings are available. ``(7) The percentage rate in paragraph (1) shall be 75 percent beginning 3 years and 3 months after the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002. ``(i)(1) Except as provided under paragraph (7), on a city pair route in the State of Alaska, the Postal Service shall offer equitable tender of 20 percent of the nonpriority bypass mail on such route to those carriers transporting 25 percent or more of the total nonmail freight (in revenue or weight as determined by the Postal Service), for the 12 months immediately preceding the date on which the freight carrier seeks tender of such mail. ``(2) To remain eligible for equitable tender under this subsection, a freight carrier shall continue to provide not less than 25 percent of the nonmail freight service on the city pair route for which the carrier is seeking tender of such mail. ``(3) If a new freight carrier enters a market, the freight carrier shall meet the minimum requirements of subsection (g)(1) and shall operate for 12 months on a city pair route in the State of Alaska before being eligible for equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail on that route. ``(4) If no carrier qualifies for tender of nonpriority bypass mail on a city pair route in the State of Alaska under this subsection, such mail to be divided under this subsection, as described in paragraph (1), shall be tendered to the nonmail freight carrier providing the highest percentage of nonmail freight service (in terms of revenue or weight as determined by the Postal Service as calculated under paragraph (6)) on the city pair route. If no nonmail freight carrier is present on a city pair route in the State of Alaska to receive tender of nonpriority bypass mail under this paragraph, the nonpriority bypass mail to be divided under paragraph (1) shall be divided equitably among carriers qualified under subsection (h). ``(5) Qualification for the tender of mail under this subsection shall not be counted toward the minimum qualifications necessary to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail on any other route. ``(6)(A) In this subsection, the percent of nonmail freight shall be calculated as a percentage, using the data provided pursuant to subsection (k), by dividing the revenue or weight (as determined by the Postal Service) of nonmail freight earned by or carried

by a carrier from the transport of nonmail freight from an origination point to a destination point by the total amount of revenue or weight of nonmail freight earned by or carried by all carriers from the transport of nonmail freight from the origination point to the destination point. ``(B) To ensure accurate reporting of market share the Postal Service shall compare the resulting percentage under subparagraph (A) to the lesser of-- ``(i) the amount of the freight excise tax paid by or on behalf of a carrier, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares for nonmail freight actually flown by a carrier from the origination point to the destination point, divided by the value of the total nonmail freight excise taxes, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares paid by or on behalf of all nonmail freight carriers providing service from the origination point to the destination point; or ``(ii) the amount of half of the nonmail freight excise tax paid by or on behalf of a carrier, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares for nonmail freight actually flown by a carrier on the city pair route, divided by the value of the total nonmail freight excise taxes, as determined by reviewing the collected amount of base fares paid by or on behalf of all nonmail freight carriers providing service on the city pair route.

``(7) The percentage rate in paragraph (1) shall be 25 percent beginning 3 years and 3 months after the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002. ``(j)(1) Except as provided by paragraph (3), there shall be equitable tender of 10 percent of the nonpriority bypass mail to all carriers on each city pair route in the State of Alaska meeting the requirements of subsection (g)(1) that do not otherwise qualify for tender under subsection (h) or (i). ``(2) If no carrier qualifies under this subsection with respect to a city pair route, the 10 percent of nonpriority bypass mail allocated under paragraph (1) shall be divided evenly between the pools described under subsections (h) and (i) to be equitably tendered among qualified carriers under such subsections, such that-- ``(A) the amount of nonpriority bypass mail available for tender among qualified carriers under subsection (h) shall be 75 percent; and ``(B) the amount of nonpriority bypass mail available for tender among qualified carriers under subsection (i) shall be 25 percent.

``(3)(A) Except as provided by subparagraph (B), the percentage rate under paragraph (1) shall be 0 percent beginning 3 years and 3 months after the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002. ``(B) The percentage rate under paragraph (1) shall remain 10 percent for equitable tender for 6 years and 3 months after the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002 for a nonpriority bypass mail carrier on bush routes in the State of Alaska originating from the main hub of the carrier designated under subparagraph (C), if the carrier seeking the tender of such mail-- ``(i) meets the requirements of subsection (g)(1); ``(ii) is not qualified under subsection (h) or (i);

``(iii) operates routes originating from the main hub of the carrier designated under subparagraph (C); and ``(iv) has invested at least $500,000 in a physical hanger facility prior to January 1, 2002 in such a hub city.

``(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), a carrier may designate only one hub city as its main hub and once such designation is transmitted to the Postal Service it may not be changed. Such selection and transmission must be transmitted to the Postal Service within 6 months of the date of enactment of the Rural Service Improvement Act of 2002. A carrier attempting to receive tender of nonpriority bypass mail under this subsection shall not be eligible for such tender after the carrier becomes qualified for tender of nonpriority bypass mail under subsection (h) or (i) on any route. The purchase of another carrier's hanger facility after such date of enactment shall not be considered sufficient to meet the requirement of subparagraph (B)(iv). ``(k)(1) At least once every 2 years, in conjunction with annual updates, the Secretary shall review the need for a bush mail rate investigation. The Secretary shall use show cause procedures to speedily and more accurately determine the cost of providing bush mail service. In determining such rates, the Secretary shall not take into account the cost of passenger insurance rates or premiums paid by the passenger carriers or other costs associated with passenger service. ``(2) In order to ensure sufficient, reliable, and timely traffic data to meet the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary shall require-- ``(A) the monthly submission of the bush carrier's data on T-100 diskettes, or any other suitable form of data collection, as determined by the Secretary; and ``(B) the carriers to retain all books, records, and other source and summary documentation to support their reports and to preserve and maintain such documentation in a manner that readily permits the audit and examination by representatives of the Postal Service or the Secretary.

``(3) Documentation under paragraph (2) shall be retained for 7 years or until the Secretary indicates that the records may be destroyed. Copies of flight logs for aircraft sold or disposed of shall be retained. ``(4) Carriers qualified to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail shall submit to the Secretary the number and type of aircraft in the carrier's fleet, the level of passenger insurance covering its fleet, and the name of the insurance company providing such coverage. ``(5) Not later than 30 days after the last day of each calendar month, carriers qualified or attempting to be qualified to be tendered nonpriority bypass mail shall report to the Secretary the excise taxes paid by city pair to the Department of the Treasury and the weight of and revenue earned by the carriage of nonmail freight. Final compiled data shall be made available to carriers providing service in the hub.

``(l) No qualified carrier may be tendered nonpriority bypass mail under subsections (h) and (i) simultaneously on a route unless no other carrier is tendered mail under either subsection. ``(m)(1) Carriers qualifying for tender of nonpriority bypass mail under subsections (h) and (i) simultaneously shall be tendered such mail under subsection (h).

``(2) A carrier shall be tendered nonpriority bypass mail under subsection (i) if that carrier-- ``(A) was qualified under both subsections (h) and (i) simultaneously; and ``(B) becomes unqualified under subsection (h) but remains qualified under subsection (i).

``(n)(1) A carrier operation resulting from a merger or acquisition between any 2 carriers operating between points in the State of Alaska shall have the passenger and nonmail freight of all such merged or acquired carriers on the applicable route counted toward meeting the resulting carrier's minimum requirements to receive equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail on such route for the 12-month period following the date of the merger or acquisition. ``(2) After the 12-month period described under paragraph (1), the carrier resulting from the merger or acquisition shall demonstrate that the carrier meets the minimum passenger or nonmail freight carriage requirements of this section to continue receiving tender of such mail. ``(o) In addition to any penalties applied to a carrier by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Secretary, any carrier that significantly misstates passenger or nonmail freight data required to be reported under this section on any route, in an attempt to qualify for tender of nonpriority bypass mail, shall receive-- ``(1) a 1-month suspension of tender of nonpriority bypass mail on the route where the data was misstated for the first offense; ``(2) a 6-month suspension of tender of nonpriority bypass mail on the route where the data was misstated for the second offense; ``(3) a 1-year suspension of tender of all nonpriority bypass mail in the entire State of Alaska for the third offense in the State; and ``(4) a permanent suspension of tender of all nonpriority bypass mail in the entire State of Alaska for the fourth offense in the State.

``(p)(1) The Postal Service or the Secretary, in carrying out subsection (g)(2), (h), or (i), may deny equitable tender to an otherwise qualified carrier that does not operate under this section in good faith or under the intent of this section. ``(2) The Postal Service or the Secretary may waive any provision of subsection (h) or (i), if the carrier provides substantial passenger or nonmail freight service on the route in the State of Alaska where the carrier seeks tender of nonpriority mail and nonpriority bypass mail. ``(3) To ensure adequate competition among passenger carriers on a mainline route in the State of Alaska the Postal Service or the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (g)(1)(D), (g)(2)(E), (g)(4), or (g)(5), or any provision of subsection (h) if a 121 bush passenger carrier seeks tender of nonpriority bypass mail on a mainline route in the State of Alaska not served by a 121 mainline passenger carrier and the 121 bush passenger carrier provides substantial passenger service on the route. Waivers provided for under this paragraph shall be granted only in extreme cases of lack of competition and only to extent that are absolutely necessary to meet the minimum needs of the community. Waivers granted under this subsection shall cease to be valid once a qualified

mainline passenger carrier begins providing service and seeks tender of nonpriority bypass mail in accordance with this section on the city pair route. The receipt of waivers and subsequent operation of service on a city pair route under this subsection shall not be counted towards meeting the requirements of any part of this section for any other city pair route. ``(4) In granting waivers for or denying tender to carriers under this subsection, the Postal Service or the Secretary shall consider in the following order of importance-- ``(A) the passenger needs of the destination to be served (including amount and level); ``(B) the nonmail freight needs of the destination to be served; ``(C) the amount of nonpriority bypass mail service already available to the destination; ``(D) the mail needs of the destination to be served; ``(E) the savings to the Postal Service in terms of payments made to carriers; ``(F) the amount or level of passenger service already available to the destination; and ``(G) the amount of nonmail freight service already available to the destination.

``(q) The Secretary shall make a regular review of carriers receiving, or attempting to qualify to receive, equitable tender of nonpriority bypass mail on a city pair route in the State of Alaska. If the Secretary suspends or revokes an operating certificate, the Secretary shall notify the Postal Service. Upon such notification, the Postal Service shall cease tender of mail to such carrier until the Secretary certifies the carrier is operating in a safe manner. Upon such receipt, the carrier shall demonstrate that it otherwise meets the minimum carriage requirements of this section before being tendered mail under this section. ``(r) The Postal Service shall have the authority to tender nonpriority bypass mail to any carrier that meets the requirements of subsection (g)(1) on any city pair route in the State of Alaska on an emergency basis. Such emergency tender shall cease when a carrier qualifies for tender on such route under the terms of this section. ``(s) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and except for written contracts authorized under subsections (b), (c) and (d), tender by the Postal Service of any category of mail to a carrier for transportation between any two points in the State of Alaska shall not give rise to any contract between the Postal Service and a carrier, nor shall any such carrier acquire any right in continued or future tender of such mail by virtue of past or present receipt of such mail. This subsection shall apply to any case commenced before, on, or after the date of enactment of this subsection.''. (d) Actions of Air Carriers To Qualify.--Beginning 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, if the Secretary determines, based on the Secretary's findings and recommendations of the Postal Service, that an air carrier being tendered nonpriority bush bypass mail is not taking actions to attempt to qualify as a bush passenger or nonmail freight carrier under section 5402 of title 39, United States Code (as amended by this title), the Postal Service shall immediately cease tender of all nonpriority bypass mail to such carrier.

(e) Technical and Conforming Amendments.-- (1) Title 39.--Section 5402 of title 39, United States Code, is amended-- (A) in subsections (b) through (e) (as redesignated by this title) and subsection (f) by striking ``Secretary of Transportation'' each place it appears and inserting ``Secretary''; and (B) in subsection (f)-- (i) by striking ``subsections (a), (b), and (c)'' and inserting ``subsections (b), (c), and (d)''; and (ii) by striking ``subsection (d)'' and inserting ``subsection (e)''. (2) Title 49.--Section 41901(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking ``5402(d)'' and inserting ``5402(e)''.

(f) Reports to Congress.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline. 39 USC 5402 note.>> later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Postal Service and the Secretary of Transportation shall submit a report to the Committee on Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate on the progress of implementing this title.

(g) Effective Dates.-- (1) In general.--Except as provided under paragraph (2), this title (including the amendments made by this title) shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. (2) Selection of carriers.--The amendment made by subsection (c)(5) shall take effect 15 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

(h) In publishing the Act in slip form and in the United States Statutes at Large pursuant to section 112, of title 1, United States Code, the Archivist of the United States shall include after the date of approval at the end an appendix setting forth the text of the bill referred to in subsection (a).

Section 3003 — AMENDMENTS TO THE ALASKA NATIVE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT

In subsection (e)(4) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act created by section 702 of Public Law 107-117-- (1) paragraph (B) is amended by-- (A) striking ``subsection (e)(2)'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``subsections (e)(1) or (e)(2)''; and (B) striking ``obligations under section 7 of P.L. 87-305'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``small or small disadvantaged business subcontracting goals under section 502 of P.L. 100-656, provided that where lower tier subcontractors exist, the entity shall designate the appropriate contractor or contractors to receive such credit''; and (2) paragraph (C) is amended by striking ``subsection (e)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection (e)(1) or (e)(2)''.

This Act may be cited as the ``2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response To Terrorist Attacks on the United States''.

Approved August 2, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4775 (S. 2551): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 107-480 (Comm. on Appropriations) and 107-593 (Comm. of Conference). SENATE REPORTS: No. 107-156 accompanying S. 2551 (Comm. on Appropriations). CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002): May 22-24, considered and passed House. June 3-6, considered and passed Senate, amended. July 23, House agreed to conference report. July 24, Senate agreed to conference report.

<all>