Hyperlawhypertext legal database Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al. [1982] 1 SCR 607

← Cases

Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al.

[1982] 1 SCR 607 Court SCC Decision date 1981-02-09 Docket 15179 English

PartiesHarvey Fee and Affiliated Offices Ltd. Appellants·M.J. Bradshaw, H.O. Merret, R.W. Arbuckle, H.E. Garland, S.F. Hobart, J.S. Hodgson and Bud Cullen Respondents

Counsel (4)
Pierre Fournier and Paul Marchand, for the appellants.
Jacques Ouellet, Q.C., for the respondents.
Solicitors for the appellants: Byers, Casgrain, McNally, Dingle, Benn & Lefebvre, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondents: Gaspard Côté and Jacques Ouellet, Montreal.

Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Lamer, Antonio

Decision 4–1 Majority (4) · MARTLAND J. (1)

On appeal from Federal Court of Appeal

Subjects Courts

Contents

Majority

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

MARTLAND J.

MARTLAND J.—By virtue of Rule 59 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the present appeal is held to have been abandoned unless this Court or a judge thereof otherwise orders. We do not find any basis for otherwise ordering and so this appeal must be deemed to be adandoned.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellants: Byers, Casgrain, McNally, Dingle, Benn & Lefebvre, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondents: Gaspard Côté and Jacques Ouellet, Montreal.

Footnotes

  1. [1] See [1982] 1 S.C.R. 608.