LeBel J.
LeBel J. — Having examined the appeal record and the arguments made by the parties, the Court is unanimously of the view that the appeal should be dismissed. However, it is not necessary to deal with all the questions of law raised in this appeal. Nonetheless, with respect to the question of the need for expert evidence concerning the change in behaviour of the child the prosecution alleges was assaulted by the respondent, it appears that the Quebec Court of Appeal never intended to impose a rule of law requiring such evidence in all circumstances. It is sufficient to note that the nature of the evidence presented in the Court of Québec justifies the conclusion that can be drawn from the Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision that the verdict of guilty handed down by the trial judge was unreasonable. Although admissible, the evidence presented in support of the prosecution could not support a finding that the accused was guilty, on the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.