← Cases

R. v. Bird

2009 SCC 60 [2009] 3 SCR 638 Court SCC Decision date 2009-12-18 Docket 33054 English

PartiesHer Majesty The Queen Appellant·Stephanie Rosa Bird Respondent

Judges McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert

Delivered by The Court

On appeal from Alberta

Subjects Criminal law

Contents

Reasons for Judgment — The Court

The Court — We agree with Costigan J.A., dissenting, that the evidence was incapable of supporting the defence of abandonment. No other defence arises on the facts.
The appeal is therefore allowed and the conviction for manslaughter is set aside. As the facts found by the trial judge clearly establish that the murder was planned and deliberate, and involved the unlawful confinement of the victim at the time of the killing, a conviction for first degree murder is entered.