Majority
English version of the judgment of the Court delivered by
Judgment of the Court
Was Atomic in default to the Bank?
Was the Bank entitled to take possession of the inventory without first obtaining judicial authorization?
What is the amount for which Atomic and Tardi are entitled to be credited by the Bank for the value of the inventory?
Are Atomic and Tardi entitled to be compensated for the damage alleged, namely loss of profit, damage to reputation, hardship and inconvenience?
What disposition should be made of the entirely new claims by Tardi?
Footnotes
- [1] * Judgment in rectification (1988), 21 Q.A.C. 54.