AI-generated from this judgment's text. It can contain errors and is not the official version.
No AI brief yet. Click to generate.
R. v. Jensen, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 304
Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v.
Christian Marinus Jensen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. Jensen
File No.: 25351.
1997: February 11.
Present: Sopinka, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario
APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1996), 90 O.A.C. 183, 106 C.C.C. (3d) 430, 47 C.R. (4th) 363, allowing the accused’s appeal from his conviction of sexual assault. Appeal quashed.
Robert Kelly, for the appellant.
Bruce Duncan and Shane Hickinbottom, for the respondent.
//Sopinka J.//
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1 Sopinka J. ‑‑ We are all of the view that this appeal is not based on a question of law alone. Accordingly, the appeal is quashed.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitor for the appellant: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: Bruce Duncan, Toronto.
Cases cited
- 90 O.A.C. 183 90 O.A.C. 183