Bust v. Fortner

The plaintiff having recovered a judgment for $224.13, tendered an execution to the sheriff together with the fees prescribed by law for receiving) entering and returning an execution. The sheriff refused to receive and execute the same unless the judgment creditor would pay in advance mileage fees from the sheriff’s office to the' residence of the judgment debtor and return, a distance of thirty-two miles. A motion was then made for an order directing said sheriff to perform his duty and receive and execute the process of the court. At Special Term this motion was denied.

An officer may not demand or receive any fee allowed to him by law for any service unless the service was actually rendered by him, except that he may demand in advance his fee where he is by law expressly directed or permitted to require payment before rendering service. (Pub. Off. Law, § 67, subd. 3.)

The civil fees of a sheriff were for many years fixed generally by section 3307 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Those provisions are now contained in section 1558 of the Civil Practice Act and in section 185a of the County Law (as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 921). In many instances the sheriff became entitled to his fee only when he had performed the service or executed the process; in a few, he might require payment in advance.

Subdivision 6 of section 1558 of the Civil Practice Act provides that he may require the payment in advance of his fee for receiving, entering and returning an execution. He is entitled to a fee for mileage upon an execution going and returning at the rate of ten cents per mile. If he actually and necessarily travels in executing the process, he is entitled to demand and be paid that sum from the party delivering the execution to him, when he has rendered the service, but not in advance. By an amendment of the section in 1922 (Chap. 626) there was added this provision: “ For mileage, to make a demand, upon an execution and where the collection cannot be enforced through the disposal of property, secret or otherwise, the sheriff is entitled to his travel fee as provided in this subdivision, and the party at whose instance the execution is placed

It is in reliance on this amendment, we assume, that the sheriff demanded a fee for mileage in advance. The learned court at Special-Term reached the conclusion that the amendment applied. We think this was error." The general rule as to mileage has not been changed. The sheriff is not necessarily required to make a demand on the judgment debtor; very often it is impossible. He is required only to exercise reasonable diligence to discover property subject to levy and execute the process. (35 Cyc. 1537, 1628.) But there are instances where the judgment creditor to fix liability or to lay the foundation for a further action or proceeding may desire a demand to be made on the judgment debtor personally, and upon some person to whom property has been conveyed by him secretly or otherwise. He may require the sheriff to make such demand, but under the present law, must pay the mileage fees in advance if required.

It does not appear that such were the facts when the appellant delivered the execution to the sheriff in this case. The latter was, therefore, not entitled to demand payment of mileage in advance.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.