Boylhart v. Di Marco & Reimann, Inc. — 244 A.D. 785

Majority

p. 785

Richard Boylhart, by Gertrude Boylhart, His Guardian ad Litem, and Gertrude Boylhart, Individually, Respondents, Appellants, v. Di Marco & Reimann, Inc., Respondent, Terry & Tench Company, Inc., and Another, Defendants, The Rosaire Contracting Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs against the defendant, appellant, The Rosaire Contracting Company, and with costs to defendant Di Marco & Reimann, Inc., against the plaintiffs. (See Uppington v. City of New York, 165 N. Y. 222 ; Glenn v. Oakdale Contracting Co., Inc., 257 id. 497; Schmidt v. City of New York, 179 App. Div. 667 ; affd., 228 N. Y. 572 ; Hyman v. Barrett, 224 id. 436; Hayling v. City of New York, 233 App. Div. 595 ; Hunt v. Mayor, etc., 109 N. Y. 134 .) Present— Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse on plaintiffs’ appeal and reinstate verdict against defendant Di Marco & Reimann, Inc. (See Deming v. Terminal Railway of Buffalo, 169 N. Y. 1 ; Storrs v. City of Utica, 17 id. 104 ; Downey v. Low, 22 App. Div. 460 .)

Cases cited

Uppington v. City of New York 165 N. Y. 222 N.Y. 1901-01-08 p. 785
Schmidt v. City of New York 228 N. Y. 572 N.Y. 1920-03-16 p. 785
Hunt v. Mayor of New York 109 N. Y. 134 N.Y. 1888-04-10 p. 785
Deming v. Terminal Railway of Buffalo 169 N. Y. 1 N.Y. 1901-12-10 p. 785
Downey v. Low 22 App. Div. 460 N.Y. App. Div. 1897-11-30 p. 785