Hyperlawhypertext legal database Garden City Plating & Manufacturing Co. v. Ross-Sigmond, Inc. 279 A.D. 714

← Cases

Garden City Plating & Manufacturing Co. v. Ross-Sigmond, Inc.

279 A.D. 714 Court First Department, Decision date 1951-12-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 714
First Department,
December, 1951.
(December 4, 1951.)
Garden City Plating & Manufacturing Co., on Behalf of Itself and All Other Persons Entitled to Share in Funds Received or To Be Received by Ross-Sigmond, Inc., Contractor, from Gimbel Brothers, Inc., Respondent, v. Ross-Sigmond, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

It is alleged and not denied that all others concerned in the alteration in question have been fully paid and their claims satisfied; Special Term stated that this was “ conceded ”.

Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought under section 72 of the Lien Law. Plaintiff’s proceedings and this motion appear to be maneuvers to avoid trying on the merits the issues raised in the action brought by defendant in Kings County before plaintiff instituted this action.

The order directing appellant to file a surety bond should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and plaintiff’s motion denied.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 772.]

Statutes and regulations cited