Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have examined defendant’s claims on appeal and find them to be without merit. The evidence at the suppression hearing sufficiently demonstrated that defendant was not interrogated in violation of his right to counsel. Additionally, the evidence that complainant’s jaw was swollen and caused him pain for two weeks was sufficient to establish "physical injury” (see, Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; People v James, 133 AD2d 507 , 509, lv denied 70 NY2d 933 ; People v Goico, 122 AD2d 576 ). Defendant was not entitled to have the charge of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 115.00) submitted to the jury as a lesser included offense (see, People v Palmer, 116 AD2d 767 , 769, Iv
Cases cited
- People v. James 133 AD2d 507 at 509 p. 952
- People v. Goico 122 AD2d 576 p. 952
- People v. Palmer 116 AD2d 767 at 769 p. 952
- People v. Chavis 99 AD2d 584 at 586 p. 953
- People v. Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 p. 953