Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: During jury selection in defendant’s trial on the charge of murder in the second degree, the court conducted a side-bar conference with a potential juror outside defendant’s presence. In People v Antommarchi ( 80 NY2d 247 , 250, rearg denied 81 NY2d 759 ), the Court of Appeals held that the court may not conduct such side-bar conferences to "explore prospective jurors’ backgrounds and their ability to weigh the evidence objectively unless defendant is present”. Here, however, jury selection was conducted prior to the decision in Antommarchi and, consequently, there was no statutory violation of defendant’s right to be present at a material stage of his trial (see, CPL 260.20) as that right was understood prior to October 27, 1992 (see, People v Mitchell, 80 NY2d 519 , 529; People v Burgos, 195 AD2d 978 ). Moreover,
Cases cited
- People v. Antommarchi 80 NY2d 247 at 250 p. 873
- People v. Mitchell 80 NY2d 519 at 529 p. 873
- People v. Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 p. 874
- People v. Favor 82 NY2d 254 at 268 p. 874
- People v. Colucci 198 AD2d 825 p. 874