Majority
—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered October 9, 1992, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon
Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s contention that the court’s charge on the concept of reasonable doubt shifted the burden of proof is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lavin, 182 AD2d 710 ) and, in any event, is without merit (see, People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247 ; People v Rivera, 174 AD2d 530 ).
In view of our determination under Indictment No. 8466/91, there is no basis for vacatur of the plea under Indictment No. 12221/90 (cf., People v Clark, 45 NY2d 432 ). Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 371
- People v. Lavin 182 AD2d 710 p. 371
- People v. Antommarchi 80 NY2d 247 p. 371
- People v. Clark 45 NY2d 432 p. 371